Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28009345›Full record

Observational studyEye (London, England)2017

The role of membrane-inner retina adherence in predicting simultaneous internal limiting membrane peeling during idiopathic epiretinal membrane surgery.

P Tranos, L Wickham, N Dervenis, A Vakalis, S Asteriades, P Stavrakas

Open access · bronzeAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Eye (London, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Application of digital surgery in ophthalmology: intraoperative display of pre-operative enface OCT and ERM peeling unveiling the role of ERM adherence.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  4. Ocular manifestations in Gorlin-Goltz syndrome.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2019
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

P TranosOphthalmica Eye Institute, Thessaloniki, Greece.
L WickhamMoorfields Eye Hospital, London, UK.
N DervenisOphthalmica Eye Institute, Thessaloniki, Greece.
A VakalisOphthalmica Eye Institute, Thessaloniki, Greece.
S AsteriadesOphthalmica Eye Institute, Thessaloniki, Greece.
P StavrakasAttikon University Hospital, 2nd Department of Ophthalmology, University of Athens Medical School, Athens, Greece.
Athens Eye Hospital · GRUniversity College London · GBUniversity General Hospital Attikon · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PurposeTo correlate the frequency and extent of simultaneous inadvertent internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling during idiopathic epiretinal membrane (ERM) removal with characteristics of ERM adherence demonstrated on pre-operative spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT).Patients and methodsThis is a prospective, observational, case series of patients undergoing pars plana vitrectomy for idiopathic ERM. Inner retina-ERM adhesion was categorized as focal, broad or complete in five anatomic locations at macular area based on preoperative SD-OCT findings. The extent of spontaneous ILM peeling was quantified on a scale 0-100% in each of the aforementioned anatomic locations by the operating surgeons who were masked to the OCT characteristics. All operations were recorded with a high definition recording system and the area of simultaneous ILM peel was quantified by a second masked observer. The final extent of spontaneous ILM peel was calculated as the average of the two scores.ResultsThirty consecutive subjects who underwent surgery for idiopathic ERM were included in the study. Evidence of simultaneous ILM peeling was identified in 80.3% of individuals. With regards to the type of ERM-macula adhesion, inadvertent ILM peel was observed in 70% of the patients who pre-operatively showed complete adhesion, in 43% with broad adhesion and in only 21% with focal adhesion (P<0.001). The extent of the spontaneous ILM peel during removal of ERM was also significantly dependent on the type of ERM-inner retina adhesion. Total simultaneous ILM peel was observed in 59% of locations with complete ERM-macula adhesion but only in 22% and 7% of locations with broad and focal adhesion respectively (P<0.001).ConclusionsSimultaneous ILM peel is a frequent occurrence during ERM surgery, especially when there is complete or broad ERM adherence to the macula. The type of ERM-inner retina adhesion represents a valid predictor of the extent of simultaneous ILM peel during removal of ERM. Thorough evaluation of preoperative OCT may be a useful tool in determining a safer, more simplistic strategy in ERM surgery.

Indexed as

VitrectomyAgedBasement MembraneEpiretinal MembraneFemaleGreeceHumansIndicators and ReagentsMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsPredictive Value of TestsPreoperative CareProspective StudiesRetinal Photoreceptor Cell Inner SegmentTomography, Optical CoherenceIndicators and Reagents

Identifiers

PMID28009345
PMCPMC5396004
OpenAlexW2564385539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.