Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28009069›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2017

Test-retest reliability and concurrent validity of in vivo myelin content indices: Myelin water fraction and calibrated T

Muzamil Arshad, Jeffrey A Stanley, Naftali Raz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 76 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
76citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

76 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Heritable and experience-dependent cortical traits of reading ability.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The role of neuro-imaging in multiple system atrophy.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. TImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025
    Article
  20. Article

16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Muzamil ArshadDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, School of Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan.
Jeffrey A StanleyDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, School of Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan.
Naftali RazInstitute of Gerontology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan.

Funding

Neural Correlates and Modifiers of Cognitive AgingR37AG011230 · NIA · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI RAZ, NAFTALI · 2005 to 2014
$5.2M
NEURAL CORRELATES OF AGE-RELATED DIFFERENCES IN MEMORYR01AG011230 · NIA · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI DAUGHERTY, ANA MARIE, RAZ, NAFTALI · 1993 to 2020
$4.8M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG011230NIA NIH HHS R37 AG011230
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In an age-heterogeneous sample of healthy adults, we examined test-retest reliability (with and without participant repositioning) of two popular MRI methods of estimating myelin content: modeling the short spin-spin (T

Indexed as

Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdultAgedAlgorithmsBrainCase-Control StudiesFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyelin SheathReproducibility of ResultsWaterWaterbrain water mobilityMRISimpson paradoxT2 relaxationwhite matter

Identifiers

PMID28009069
PMCPMC5342928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.