Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28008561›Full record

ArticleJournal of endocrinological investigation2017

Endpoints for screening thyroid cancer in the Republic of Korea: thyroid specialists' perspectives.

J H An, H Y Kim, S G Kim, H Dralle, G W Randolph, E Piantanida, M L Tanda, G Dionigi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of endocrinological investigation, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

J H AnDivision of Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, KUMC Thyroid Center, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
H Y KimDepartment of Surgery, KUMC Thyroid Center, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. hoonyubkim@korea.ac.kr.
S G KimDivision of Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, KUMC Thyroid Center, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. k50367@korea.ac.kr.
H DralleSection of Endocrine Surgery, Department of General, Visceraland Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
G W RandolphDivision of Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
E PiantanidaDivision of Endocrinology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy.
M L TandaDivision of Endocrinology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy.
G Dionigi1st Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences and Human Morphology, Research Center for Endocrine Surgery, University of Insubria (Varese-Como), via Guicciardini 9, 21100, Varese, Italy.
Korea University Medical Center · KRUniversity of Insubria · ITEssen University Hospital · DEHarvard University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer screening is aimed primarily at reducing deaths from the specific cancer. Thyroid-specific cancer mortality may be the most ambitious endpoint for obtaining estimates of screening effect. Numerous observations have accumulated over the years, indicating that thyroid cancer mortality endpoint has been difficult to study and is confounded by population heterogeneity, provision of randomization, and requirement of large cohorts with sufficiently long follow-up due to the excellent prognosis of the cancer. Accordingly, it may be important to reconsider how to best measure thyroid cancer screening efficacy. Recommendations against thyroid cancer screening should be based upon trials designed to evaluate its effectiveness not only in significant reduction in cancer mortality, but also of other distinct endpoints. It is desirable to evaluate derivative endpoints that can reliably predict reductions in mortality. The term "derivative" means a variable that is related to the true endpoint and is likely to be observable before the primary endpoint. Derivative endpoints may include thyroid cancer incidence, the proportion of early-stage tumors detected, more treatable stage, the identification of small tumors (to maintain in observation), decrease in the number of people who develop metastatic disease, the increased chance of lesser extent surgery, and the application of minimally invasive approaches, as well as no need for lifelong thyroid replacement therapy, a consistent follow-up, low-dose or no RAI administration and risk factor assessments where case findings should be continuous. The Korean guidelines for thyroid cancer national-level screening were published by a relevant group of multidisciplinary thyroid experts. It was concluded that the evidence is insufficient to balance the benefits and harms of thyroid cancer screening. However, the paper seems to raise the necessary investments in future research and demand a complete analysis for derivative endpoints, and offer screening participants with complete information necessary to make decisions that will provide them with the most value when a small thyroid cancer is screen-identified.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerSpecializationHumansIncidencePhysiciansPrognosisRepublic of KoreaThyroid NeoplasmsEpidemiologyRAIScreeningSurgeryThyroid cancer

Identifiers

PMID28008561
OpenAlexW2564279782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.