Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28008286›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of women's health2016

Pregnancy after bariatric surgery: improving outcomes for mother and child.

Irene González, Albert Lecube, Miguel Ángel Rubio, Pedro Pablo García-Luna

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of women's health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. ASMBS pediatric metabolic and bariatric surgery guidelines, 2018.Surgery for obesity and related diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery · 2018
    Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Irene GonzálezEndocrinology and Nutrition Department, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Huelva, Huelva, Spain.
Albert LecubeEndocrinology and Nutrition Department, Arnau de Vilanova University Hospital, Lleida Biomedicine Research Institute (IRB-Lleida), CIBER in Diabetes and Associated Metabolic Disorders (CIBERDEM), Lleida University, Lleida, Spain.
Miguel Ángel RubioEndocrinology and Nutrition Department, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, IDISSC, Madrid, Spain.
Pedro Pablo García-LunaEndocrinology and Nutrition Department, Hospitales Universitarios Virgen del Rocío, Seville, Spain.
Biomedical Research Institute of Lleida · ESHospital Clínico San Carlos · ESHospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío · ESUniversidad de Huelva · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The significant increase in the prevalence of obesity has led to an increase in the number of obese women who become pregnant. In this setting, in recent years, there has been an exponential rise in the number of bariatric procedures, with approximately half of them performed in women of childbearing age, and a remarkable surge in the number of women who become pregnant after having undergone bariatric surgery (BS). These procedures entail the risk of nutritional deficiencies, and nutrition is a crucial aspect during pregnancy. Therefore, knowledge and awareness of the consequences of these techniques on maternal and fetal outcomes is essential. Current evidence suggests a better overall obstetric outcome after BS, in comparison to morbid obese women managed conservatively, with a reduction in the prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus, pregnancy-associated hypertensive disorders, macrosomia, and congenital defects. However, the risk of potential maternal nutritional deficiencies and newborns small for gestational age cannot be overlooked. Results concerning the incidence of preterm delivery and the number of C-sections are less consistent. In this paper, we review the updated evidence regarding the impact of BS on pregnancy.

Indexed as

bariatric surgerygestational diabetes mellitusmaternal and fetal outcomespregnancysmall for gestational age

Identifiers

PMID28008286
PMCPMC5167470
OpenAlexW2562259936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.