Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28008273›Full record

ArticleOncoTargets and therapy2016

Evaluation of the efficacy of chemoradiotherapy in cervical cancer using diffusion-weighted imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient.

Fa-Jun Ju

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in OncoTargets and therapy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Magnetic resonance imaging of anal cancer: tumor characteristics and early prediction of treatment outcome.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Fa-Jun JuDepartment of Radiology, Yishui Central Hospital, Linyi, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aims to evaluate the efficacy of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in cervical cancer using diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values.

methodsA total of 71 patients with cervical cancer were enrolled in this study. All patients underwent conventional magnetic resonance imaging and DWI scanning before CRT and at 7, 14, 21 days, and 6 months after CRT. These patients were divided into the complete response (CR) and non-CR groups according to the response evaluation criteria in solid tumors criteria. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the accuracy of ADC values in predicting the efficacy of CRT in cervical cancer.

resultsCompared with before-CRT treatment, tumor volumes were reduced and ADC values were elevated in both CR and non-CR groups after CRT treatment. At 21 days after CRT, tumor volumes in the CR group were smaller than those in the non-CR group. During the period of 21 days to 6 months after CRT, tumor regression rate and the increased rate of ADC values in the CR group were higher than those in the non-CR group. ROC curves revealed that the increased rate of ADC values at 21 days after CRT was the optimal time point for the prediction of CRT efficacy in cervical cancer, with the area under the curve, sensitivity, and specificity of 0.775, 92.7%, and 62.5%, respectively.

conclusionOur study provides evidence that the increased rate of ADC at 21 days after CRT might be a promising tool for predicting the efficacy of CRT in cervical cancer.

Indexed as

apparent diffusion coefficientcervical cancerchemoradiotherapydiffusion-weighted imagingefficacy

Identifiers

PMID28008273
PMCPMC5167496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.