Trial reportJAMA oncology2017
Association of DNA Mismatch Repair and Mutations in BRAF and KRAS With Survival After Recurrence in Stage III Colon Cancers : A Secondary Analysis of 2 Randomized Clinical Trials.
Trial report in JAMA oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 54 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized Phase III Trial of Oxaliplatin (OXAL) Plus 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU)/Leucovorin (CF) With or Without Cetuximab (C225) After Curative Resection for Patients With Stage III Colon Cancer
A Phase III Clinical Trial Comparing Infusional 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU), Leucovorin, and Oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX6) Every Two Weeks With Bevacizumab to the Same Regimen Without Bevacizumab for the Treatment of Patients With Resected Stages II and III Carcinoma of the Colon
Who cites it
54 citing papers in PubMed, 93 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prognostic variables in low and high risk stage III colon cancers treated in two adjuvant chemotherapy trials.European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990) · 2021Trial
- Prognostic Factors for Cancer-Specific Survival after Recurrence in Chemo-Naïve Stage I-III Colorectal Cancer.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2026Article
- The Heterogeneity of Mucinous Colorectal Adenocarcinoma-Histologic and Molecular Phenotypes Drive Prognostic Outcomes.Cancers · 2026Article
- Multi-sequence MRI deep learning and habitat radiomics for predicting mismatch repair status and prognosis in colorectal liver metastasis: a multicenter study.La Radiologia medica · 2026Article
- Multi-omics analysis linksTranslational cancer research · 2026Article
- Secondary Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials: Methodological Considerations and Best Practices.Annals of clinical epidemiology · 2025Article
- Pathogenetic development, diagnosis and clinical therapeutic approaches for liver metastasis from colorectal cancer (Review).International journal of oncology · 2025Review
- Evolution of Rapid Clonal Dynamics and Non-Cross-Resistance in Response to Alternating Targeted Therapy and Chemotherapy in BRAF-V600E-Mutant Colon Cancer.JCO precision oncology · 2024Article
- The tumor immune microenvironment and T-cell-related immunotherapies in colorectal cancer.Discover oncology · 2024Review
- Preclinical efficacy of carfilzomib in BRAF-mutant colorectal cancer models.Molecular oncology · 2024Article
- Gastrointestinal Malignancy: Genetic Implications to Clinical Applications.Cancer treatment and research · 2024Review
- Evaluation of Fluctuations ofMicroRNA (Shariqah, United Arab Emirates) · 2024Article
- BRAF V600E/RAS Mutations and Lynch Syndrome in Patients With MSI-H/dMMR Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.The oncologist · 2023Article
- Molecular subtyping in colorectal cancer: A bridge to personalized therapy (Review).Oncology letters · 2023Review
- Article
- Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases: Genomics and Biomarkers with Focus on Local Therapies.Cancers · 2023Review
- Association Between Survival and Metastatic Site in Mismatch Repair-Deficient Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treated With First-line Pembrolizumab.JAMA network open · 2023Article
- Efficacy and influencing factors of Insect Compound Particle combined with chemotherapy for mismatch repair-related locally advanced stage III CRC who had undergone surgery and achieved R0 resection: a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial protocol.Annals of translational medicine · 2023Article
- DNA methylation profile in CpG-depleted regions uncovers a high-risk subtype of early-stage colorectal cancer.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
11 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
importanceThe association of biomarkers with patient survival after recurrence (SAR) of cancer is poorly understood but may guide management and treatment.
objectiveTo determine the association of DNA mismatch repair (MMR) status and somatic mutation in the B-Raf proto-oncogene (c.1799T>A [V600E]; BRAFV600E) or exon 2 of the KRAS proto-oncogene (KRAS) in the primary tumor with SAR in patients with stage III colon carcinomas treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND
participantsPatients with resected stage III colon cancers were randomized to adjuvant FOLFOX (folinic acid [leucovorin calcium], fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin) chemotherapy with or without cetuximab (North Central Cancer Treatment Group N0147 trial) or adjuvant FOLFOX chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab (National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project C-08 trial). Associations of biomarkers with SAR were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for clinicopathologic features and time to recurrence (data collected February 10, 2004, to August 7, 2015). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary study outcome was survival after recurrence of cancer. A secondary outcome measure was the effect of the site of the primary tumor on the association of biomarkers with SAR.
resultsAmong 871 patients with cancer recurrence in the N0147 trial (472 men [54.2%] and 399 women [45.8%]; mean [SD] age, 57.8 [11.2] years) and 524 in the C-08 trial (269 men [51.3%] and 255 women [48.7%]; mean [SD] age, 57.0 [11.7] years), multivariable analysis revealed that patients whose tumors had deficient vs proficient MMR had significantly better SAR (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR], 0.70; 95% CI, 0.52-0.96; P = .03). Patients whose tumors harbored mutant BRAFV600E (AHR, 2.45; 95% CI, 1.85-3.25; P < .001) or mutant KRAS (AHR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.00-1.47; P = .052) had worse SAR compared with those whose tumors had wild-type copies of both genes, although only results for BRAFV600E achieved statistical significance. Significant interactions were found for MMR (P = .03) and KRAS (P = .02) by primary tumor site for SAR. Improved SAR was observed for patients with deficient MMR tumors of the proximal vs distal colon (AHR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.40-0.83; P = .003), and worse SAR was observed for tumors of the distal colon with mutant KRAS in codon 12 (AHR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.30-2.38; P < .001) and codon 13 (AHR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.08-2.86; P = .02). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In patients with recurrence of stage III colon cancer, deficient MMR was significantly associated with better SAR, and this benefit was limited to primary tumors of the proximal colon. Mutations in BRAFV600E were significantly associated with worse SAR, and worse SAR for BRAFV600E or KRAS mutant tumors was more strongly associated with distal cancers. These biomarkers have implications for patient management at recurrence.
trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov Identifiers: NCT00079274 and NCT00096278.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.