Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28005479›Full record

ArticlePublic health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974)

Exploring Costing Methods for Environmental Health Services in North Carolina.

Simone R Singh, Nancy L Winterbauer, Ashley Tucker, Lisa Macon Harrison

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Simone R Singh1 Department of Health Management and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Nancy L Winterbauer2 Department of Public Health, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA.
Ashley Tucker2 Department of Public Health, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA.
Lisa Macon Harrison3 Granville Vance Health Department, Oxford, NC, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

All local health departments in North Carolina are mandated to provide a defined set of environmental health services, yet few have the tools to understand the costs incurred in delivering these services. The objectives of this study were to (1) derive cost estimates for 2 commonly provided environmental health services-food and lodging inspections and on-site water services-and (2) explore factors that drive variations in costs, focusing on the roles of economies of scale and scope. Using data from 15 local health departments in North Carolina, we found that costs varied substantially. A bivariate analysis found evidence of economies of scale: higher volumes of services were associated with lower costs per service. Providing a greater scope of services, however, was not consistently associated with reduced costs. In-depth cost data provide public health officials with key information when deciding how to best serve their communities.

Indexed as

Environmental HealthCosts and Cost AnalysisHumansNorth CarolinaSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesUnited States Public Health Servicecostenvironmental healthessential public health services

Identifiers

PMID28005479
PMCPMC5298501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.