ReviewAnnals of the American Thoracic Society2016
Exposure Memory and Lung Regeneration.
Review in Annals of the American Thoracic Society, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advancing Exposomic Research in Prenatal Respiratory Disease Programming.Immunology and allergy clinics of North America · 2023Review
- A review on the application of the exposome paradigm to unveil the environmental determinants of age-related diseases.Human genomics · 2022Review
- Airborne particles in city bus: concentrations, sources and simulated pulmonary solubility.Environmental geochemistry and health · 2021Article
- Omics Integration for Mitochondria Systems Biology.Antioxidants & redox signaling · 2020Review
- A vision for exposome epidemiology: The pregnancy exposome in relation to breast cancer in the Child Health and Development Studies.Reproductive toxicology (Elmsford, N.Y.) · 2020Article
- Redox theory of aging: implications for health and disease.Clinical science (London, England : 1979) · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Many acute and chronic lung diseases could benefit from improved regeneration therapy. In development and throughout life, genetically encoded exposure memory systems allow environmental exposures, diet, and infectious agents to direct subsequent phenotypic adaptation and responses. The impact of such memory systems on lung regeneration is currently unknown. This article provides a brief overview of advances in redox biology and medicine as a framework for elucidating exposure memory and delineating spatiotemporal responses in lung regeneration. New imaging and omics methods enable precise definition to advance knowledge of development and the cumulative changes in lung biochemistry, structure, and cell populations occurring from prior and ongoing exposures. Importantly, conditioning steps may be needed to reverse exposure memory and enable effective regeneration. Thus, to complement developmental biology and regenerative medicine, research programs are needed to gain systematic knowledge of how lifelong exposures impact lung biology and support transition of lung regeneration from hypothetical to practical medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.