Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28005260›Full record

ArticleClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2017

High early growth response 1 (EGR1) expression correlates with resistance to anti-EGFR treatment in vitro and with poorer outcome in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with cetuximab.

S S Kumar, Y Tomita, J Wrin, M Bruhn, A Swalling, M Mohammed, T J Price, J E Hardingham

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Inhibition of EGR1 inhibits glioma proliferation by targeting CCND1 promoter.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2017
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

S S KumarBasil Hetzel Institute, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, 28 Woodville Road, Woodville, SA, 5011, Australia.
Y TomitaSchool of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, 5005, Australia.
J WrinBasil Hetzel Institute, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, 28 Woodville Road, Woodville, SA, 5011, Australia.
M BruhnBasil Hetzel Institute, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, 28 Woodville Road, Woodville, SA, 5011, Australia.
A SwallingDepartment of Anatomical Pathology, SA Pathology, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, 28 Woodville Road, Woodville, SA, 5011, Australia.
M MohammedDepartment of Anatomical Pathology, SA Pathology, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, 28 Woodville Road, Woodville, SA, 5011, Australia.
T J PriceSchool of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, 5005, Australia.
J E HardinghamBasil Hetzel Institute, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, 28 Woodville Road, Woodville, SA, 5011, Australia. Jennifer.hardingham@adelaide.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8277-1199
Basil Hetzel Institute · AUSouth Australia Pathology · AUQueen Elizabeth Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeBiomarkers, such as mutant RAS, predict resistance to anti-EGFR therapy in only a proportion of patients, and hence, other predictive biomarkers are needed. The aims were to identify candidate genes upregulated in colorectal cancer cell lines resistant to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody treatment, to knockdown (KD) these genes in the resistant cell lines to determine if sensitivity to anti-EGFR antibody was restored, and finally to perform a pilot correlative study of EGR1 expression and outcomes in a cohort of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients given cetuximab therapy.

methodsComparative expression array analysis of resistant cell lines (SW48, COLO-320DM, and SNU-C1) vs sensitive cell lines (LIM1215, CaCo2, and SW948) was performed. The highest up-regulated gene in each resistant cell line was knocked down (KD) using RNA interference, and effect on proliferation was assessed with and without anti-EGFR treatment. Expression of the candidate genes in patients' tumours treated with cetuximab was assessed by immunohistochemistry; survival analyses were performed comparing high vs low expression.

resultsGenes significantly upregulated in resistant cell lines were EGR1 (early growth response protein 1), HBEGF (heparin-binding epidermal growth factor-like growth factor), and AKT3 (AKT serine/threonine kinase 3). KD of each gene resulted in the respective cells being more sensitive to anti-EGFR treatment, suggesting that the resistant phenotype was reversed. In the pilot study of mCRC patients treated with cetuximab, both median PFS (1.38 months vs 6.79 months; HR 2.77 95% CI 1.2-19.4) and median OS (2.59 months vs 9.82 months; HR 3.0 95% CI 1.3-23.2) were significantly worse for those patients with high EGR1 expression.

conclusionHigh EGR1 expression may be a candidate biomarker of resistance to anti-EGFR therapy.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorCetuximabCohort StudiesColorectal NeoplasmsDrug Resistance, NeoplasmEarly Growth Response Protein 1ErbB ReceptorsHumansKaplan-Meier EstimatePilot ProjectsAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorCetuximabEarly Growth Response Protein 1EGFR protein, humanEGR1 protein, humanErbB ReceptorsAnti-EGFR therapyColorectal cancerEGR1Predictive biomarkerResistance

Identifiers

PMID28005260
OpenAlexW2562530427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.