Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28004838›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

Genome-wide analysis of long-term evolutionary domestication in Drosophila melanogaster.

Mark A Phillips, Anthony D Long, Zachary S Greenspan, Lee F Greer, Molly K Burke, Bryant Villeponteau, Kennedy C Matsagas, Cristina L Rizza, Laurence D Mueller, Michael R Rose

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Beyond Fixation: Persistent Genetic Variation Under Intense Selection.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. How predictable is adaptation from standing genetic variation? Experimental evolution inPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Long-term gut microbiome dynamics inProceedings. Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Evolution, Chance, and Aging.Frontiers in genetics · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mark A PhillipsUniversity of California, Irvine, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Irvine, CA, 92617, USA.
Anthony D LongUniversity of California, Irvine, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Irvine, CA, 92617, USA.
Zachary S GreenspanUniversity of California, Irvine, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Irvine, CA, 92617, USA.
Lee F GreerUniversity of California, Irvine, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Irvine, CA, 92617, USA.
Molly K BurkeOregon State University, Department of Integrative Biology, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA.
Bryant VilleponteauGenescient Inc., Fountain Valley, CA 92708, USA.
Kennedy C MatsagasGenescient Inc., Fountain Valley, CA 92708, USA.
Cristina L RizzaGenescient Inc., Fountain Valley, CA 92708, USA.
Laurence D MuellerUniversity of California, Irvine, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Irvine, CA, 92617, USA.
Michael R RoseUniversity of California, Irvine, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Irvine, CA, 92617, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Experimental evolutionary genomics now allows biologists to test fundamental theories concerning the genetic basis of adaptation. We have conducted one of the longest laboratory evolution experiments with any sexually-reproducing metazoan, Drosophila melanogaster. We used next-generation resequencing data from this experiment to examine genome-wide patterns of genetic variation over an evolutionary time-scale that approaches 1,000 generations. We also compared measures of variation within and differentiation between our populations to simulations based on a variety of evolutionary scenarios. Our analysis yielded no clear evidence of hard selective sweeps, whereby natural selection acts to increase the frequency of a newly-arising mutation in a population until it becomes fixed. We do find evidence for selection acting on standing genetic variation, as independent replicate populations exhibit similar population-genetic dynamics, without obvious fixation of candidate alleles under selection. A hidden-Markov model test for selection also found widespread evidence for selection. We found more genetic variation genome-wide, and less differentiation between replicate populations genome-wide, than arose in any of our simulated evolutionary scenarios.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionAdaptation, PhysiologicalAllelesAnimalsCell DifferentiationComputer SimulationDomesticationDrosophila melanogasterFemaleGene FrequencyGenetics, PopulationGenetic VariationGenome, InsectGenomicsHeterozygoteMarkov Chains

Identifiers

PMID28004838
PMCPMC5177908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.