Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28004582›Full record

ArticleJournal of proteome research2017

Weighted Protein Interaction Network Analysis of Frontotemporal Dementia.

Raffaele Ferrari, Ruth C Lovering, John Hardy, Patrick A Lewis, Claudia Manzoni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of proteome research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. SNPeffect: identifying functional roles of SNPs using metabolic networks.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. APP-derived peptides reflect neurodegeneration in frontotemporal dementia.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Raffaele FerrariDepartment of Molecular Neuroscience, UCL Institute of Neurology , Russell Square House, 9-12 Russell Square House, London WC1B 5EH, United Kingdom.
Ruth C LoveringCentre for Cardiovascular Genetics, Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London , London WC1E 6JF, United Kingdom.
John HardyDepartment of Molecular Neuroscience, UCL Institute of Neurology , Russell Square House, 9-12 Russell Square House, London WC1B 5EH, United Kingdom.
Patrick A LewisDepartment of Molecular Neuroscience, UCL Institute of Neurology , Russell Square House, 9-12 Russell Square House, London WC1B 5EH, United Kingdom.
Claudia ManzoniDepartment of Molecular Neuroscience, UCL Institute of Neurology , Russell Square House, 9-12 Russell Square House, London WC1B 5EH, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5367-4023

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/L010933/1Medical Research Council MR/N026004/1Parkinson's UK F-1002Parkinson's UK G-1307Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust WT08969
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The genetic analysis of complex disorders has undoubtedly led to the identification of a wealth of associations between genes and specific traits. However, moving from genetics to biochemistry one gene at a time has, to date, rather proved inefficient and under-powered to comprehensively explain the molecular basis of phenotypes. Here we present a novel approach, weighted protein-protein interaction network analysis (W-PPI-NA), to highlight key functional players within relevant biological processes associated with a given trait. This is exemplified in the current study by applying W-PPI-NA to frontotemporal dementia (FTD): We first built the state of the art FTD protein network (FTD-PN) and then analyzed both its topological and functional features. The FTD-PN resulted from the sum of the individual interactomes built around FTD-spectrum genes, leading to a total of 4198 nodes. Twenty nine of 4198 nodes, called inter-interactome hubs (IIHs), represented those interactors able to bridge over 60% of the individual interactomes. Functional annotation analysis not only reiterated and reinforced previous findings from single genes and gene-coexpression analyses but also indicated a number of novel potential disease related mechanisms, including DNA damage response, gene expression regulation, and cell waste disposal and potential biomarkers or therapeutic targets including EP300. These processes and targets likely represent the functional core impacted in FTD, reflecting the underlying genetic architecture contributing to disease. The approach presented in this study can be applied to other complex traits for which risk-causative genes are known as it provides a promising tool for setting the foundations for collating genomics and wet laboratory data in a bidirectional manner. This is and will be critical to accelerate molecular target prioritization and drug discovery.

Indexed as

Gene Regulatory NetworksSystems BiologyAdenosine TriphosphatasesAmyloid beta-Protein PrecursorCell Cycle ProteinsE1A-Associated p300 ProteinELAV-Like Protein 1Frontotemporal DementiaGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression RegulationGenome-Wide Association StudyGenotypeHumansMetabolic Networks and PathwaysPhenotypeProtein Interaction MappingAdenosine TriphosphatasesAmyloid beta-Protein PrecursorAPP protein, humanCell Cycle ProteinsE1A-Associated p300 ProteinELAVL1 protein, humanELAV-Like Protein 1EP300 protein, humanValosin Containing Proteincomplex disordersfrontotemporal dementiafunctional enrichmentprotein−protein interactionssystems biologyweighted protein network

Identifiers

PMID28004582
PMCPMC6152613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.