SynthesisClinical cardiology2017
Direct oral anticoagulant use in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation with valvular heart disease: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Clinical cardiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Direct oral anticoagulant use in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation with valvular heart disease: a systematic review.Clinical cardiology · 2017Pooled it
- Real-world incidence of efficacy and safety outcomes in patients on direct oral anticoagulants with left ventricular systolic dysfunction at a tertiary referral center.Clinical cardiology · 2017Trial
- Disparities in the real-world prescription pattern of oral anticoagulants for US Medicare beneficiaries: a geospatial analysis.BMJ open · 2024Article
- Secondary Mitral Regurgitation: Cardiac Remodeling, Diagnosis, and Management.Structural heart : the journal of the Heart Team · 2023Review
- Assessing left atrial function in patients with atrial fibrillation and valvular heart disease using cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging.Clinical cardiology · 2022Article
- Comparative Risks of Fracture Among Direct Oral Anticoagulants and Warfarin: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
- Demonstration of Patient-Specific Simulations to Assess Left Atrial Appendage Thrombogenesis Risk.Frontiers in physiology · 2021Article
- Apixaban: a novel agent to treat heparin induced thrombocytopenia and to prevent embolism in patient with atrial fibrillation after multiple valve replacement?Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2019Article
- Fill in the Gaps of Secondary Mitral Regurgitation: a Continuum Challenge From Pathophysiology to Prognosis.Current heart failure reports · 2018Review
- Edoxaban Use in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation With Valvular Heart Disease-Insights from ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48.Clinical cardiology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are indicated for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), which, according to the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association/Heart Rhythm Society atrial fibrillation (AF) guidelines, excludes patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis, a mechanical or bioprosthetic heart valve, or mitral valve repair. However, the data regarding use of DOACs in AF patients with other types of valvular heart disease (VHD) are unclear. We aimed to summarize and evaluate the literature regarding the safety and efficacy of DOAC use in NVAF patients with other types of VHD. After an extensive literature search, a total of 1 prospective controlled trial, 4 subanalyses, and 1 abstract were identified. Efficacy of the DOAC agents in NVAF patients with VHD mirrored the overall trial results. Bleeding risk was significantly increased in VHD patients treated with rivaroxaban, but not for dabigatran or apixaban. Of the bioprosthetic valve patients enrolled in the Apixaban for Reduction in Stroke and Other Thromboembolic Events in Atrial Fibrillation (ARISTOTLE) trial, no safety or efficacy concerns were identified. In conclusion, subanalyses of DOAC landmark AF trials revealed that dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban may be safely used in AF patients with certain types of VHD: aortic stenosis, aortic regurgitation, and mitral regurgitation. More evidence is needed before routinely recommending these agents for patients with bioprosthetic valves or mild mitral stenosis. Patients with moderate to severe mitral stenosis or mechanical valves should continue to receive warfarin, as these patients were excluded from all landmark AF trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.