Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28004321›Full record

Trial reportQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2017

Improvement in the quality of life following cholecystectomy: a randomized multicenter study of health status (RAND-36) in patients with laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus minilaparotomy cholecystectomy.

Samuli Aspinen, Jari Kärkkäinen, Jukka Harju, Petri Juvonen, Hannu Kokki, Matti Eskelinen

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Persistent Postural-Perceptual Dizziness (PPPD) and quality of life: a cross-sectional study.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Samuli AspinenDepartment of Surgery, Kuopio University Hospital and School of Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, P.O. Box 100, 70029, Kuopio, Finland.
Jari KärkkäinenDepartment of Surgery, Kuopio University Hospital and School of Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, P.O. Box 100, 70029, Kuopio, Finland.
Jukka HarjuDepartment of Surgery, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Petri JuvonenDepartment of Surgery, Kuopio University Hospital and School of Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, P.O. Box 100, 70029, Kuopio, Finland.
Hannu KokkiDepartment of Anaesthesia and Operative Services, Kuopio University Hospital and School of Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Matti EskelinenDepartment of Surgery, Kuopio University Hospital and School of Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, P.O. Box 100, 70029, Kuopio, Finland. matti.eskelinen@kuh.fi.
University of Eastern Finland · FIKuopio University Hospital · FIHelsinki University Hospital · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe assessment of the quality of life (QoL) in minilaparotomy cholecystectomy (MC) versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) with the ultrasonic dissection in both groups has not been addressed earlier.

methodsInitially, 109 patients with non-complicated symptomatic gallstone disease were randomized to undergo either MC (n = 59) or LC (n = 50). RAND-36 survey was conducted preoperatively and at 4 weeks and 6 months postoperatively. The end point of our study was to determine differences in health status in MC versus LC groups.

resultsQoL improved significantly in both groups, and the recovery was similar in the two groups, except from the higher score in 'health change' subscale at 4 weeks in MC group [MC score 75.0 (25.0) vs. LC score 56.5 (23.2), p = 0.008]. The MC and LC groups combined, RAND-36 scores increased significantly in 'physical functioning' [combined mean (SD) preoperative score 80.5 (23.9) vs. 6-month postoperative score 86.5 (21.7), p = 0.015], 'vitality' [64.5 (19.2) vs. 73.5 (18.3), p = 0.001], 'health change' [43.0 (21.6) vs. 74.6 (25.4), p = 0.0001] and 'bodily pain' scores [57.7 (26.3) vs. 75.5 (25.5), p = 0.001], respectively. Four RAND-36 domains indicated statistically significant health status differences in comparing the preoperative and postoperative RAND-36 scores in LC and MC groups combined.

conclusionsFour RAND-36 domains indicated a significant positive change in QoL after cholecystectomy.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeCholecystectomy, LaparoscopicCholecystolithiasisFemaleFinlandHumansMaleMiddle AgedMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresPostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment OutcomeCholecystectomyHealth statusLaparoscopyMinilaparotomyRAND-36

Identifiers

PMID28004321
OpenAlexW2564021798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.