Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28004305›Full record

SynthesisDrugs2017

Topiramate in the Treatment of Generalized Convulsive Status Epilepticus in Adults: A Systematic Review with Individual Patient Data Analysis.

Francesco Brigo, Nicola Luigi Bragazzi, Stanley C Igwe, Raffaele Nardone, Eugen Trinka

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Drugs, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. [Management of refractory and super-refractory status epilepticus].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2019
    Review
  6. Antiseizure medications in critical care: an update.Current opinion in critical care · 2019
    Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Francesco BrigoDepartment of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement, University of Verona, Piazzale L.A. Scuro, 10, 37134, Verona, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0928-1577
Nicola Luigi BragazziDepartment of Health Sciences (DISSAL), School of Public Health, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Stanley C IgweDepartment of Neuro-Psychiatry, Federal Teaching Hospital, Abakaliki, Ebonyi, Nigeria.
Raffaele NardoneDepartment of Neurology, Franz Tappeiner Hospital, Merano, Italy.
Eugen TrinkaDepartment of Neurology, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria. e.trinka@salk.at.
Federal Teaching Hospital Abakaliki · NGParacelsus Medical University · ATUniversity of Genoa · ITUniversity of Salzburg · ATUniversity of Verona · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGeneralized convulsive status epilepticus (GCSE) is a medical emergency associated with high morbidity and mortality that requires prompt medical intervention. Topiramate (TPM) is an antiepileptic drug effective against a broad spectrum of seizure types, and has been proposed as a possible therapeutic option for super-refractory status epilepticus (SRSE), the most severe form of GCSE.

aimThis review aimed to evaluate the role of TPM in GCSE, including SRSE.

methodsMEDLINE, CENTRAL, ClinicalTrials.gov, LILACS, Google Scholar, and Opengrey.eu were systematically searched. We compared: (1) patients who did and who did not receive TPM as their last drug; (2) patients receiving TPM as the last drug and achieving SE control and patients receiving TPM as the last drug but without termination of SE.

resultsThe literature search yielded 1164 results, with individual data available for 35 patients (six with SRSE) from four studies. SE was controlled in 68.6% of patients receiving TPM either as the last drug (20) or not (15), and in 14 of the 20 patients receiving TPM as the last drug (70%). Only six patients received TPM for SRSE; in five of them, TPM was administered as the last drug with resolution of SE in four. When comparing patients who did and did not receive TPM as the last drug, no statistically significant difference was found for any of the variables considered; similarly, no difference was found comparing patients receiving TPM as the last drug and achieving SE control with those receiving TPM as the last drug but without termination of SE.

conclusionsThe lack of a statistically significant difference is likely to be due to the small sample size. In only a few patients was TPM used for SRSE. There is an unmet need for high-quality studies to evaluate the role of TPM in GCSE.

Indexed as

AdultAnticonvulsantsFructoseHumansStatus EpilepticusTopiramateAnticonvulsantsFructoseTopiramate

Identifiers

PMID28004305
PMCPMC5216088
OpenAlexW2564786687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.