Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28004161›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2017

MRI fused with prone FDG PET/CT improves the primary tumour staging of patients with breast cancer.

Maria J Garcia-Velloso, Maria J Ribelles, Macarena Rodriguez, Alejandro Fernandez-Montero, Lidia Sancho, Elena Prieto, Marta Santisteban, Natalia Rodriguez-Spiteri, Miguel A Idoate, Fernando Martinez-Regueira and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Maria J Garcia-VellosoDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Avenida Pio XII 36, 31008, Pamplona, Spain. mjgarciave@unav.es.
Maria J RibellesDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Avenida Pio XII 36, 31008, Pamplona, Spain.
Macarena RodriguezDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Avenida Pio XII 36, 31008, Pamplona, Spain.
Alejandro Fernandez-MonteroDepartment of Occupational Medicine, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Avenida Pio XII 36, 31008, Pamplona, Spain.
Lidia SanchoDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Avenida Pio XII 36, 31008, Pamplona, Spain.
Elena PrietoDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Avenida Pio XII 36, 31008, Pamplona, Spain.
Marta SantistebanDepartment of Oncology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Avenida Pio XII 36, 31008, Pamplona, Spain.
Natalia Rodriguez-SpiteriDepartment of Surgery, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Avenida Pio XII 36, 31008, Pamplona, Spain.
Miguel A IdoateDepartment of Pathology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Avenida Pio XII 36, 31008, Pamplona, Spain.
Fernando Martinez-RegueiraDepartment of Surgery, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Avenida Pio XII 36, 31008, Pamplona, Spain.
Arlette ElizaldeDepartment of Radiology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Avenida Pio XII 36, 31008, Pamplona, Spain.
Luis J PinaDepartment of Radiology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Avenida Pio XII 36, 31008, Pamplona, Spain.
Clinica Universidad de Navarra · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveOur aim was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) fused with prone 2-[fluorine-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) in primary tumour staging of patients with breast cancer.

methodsThis retrospective study evaluated 45 women with 49 pathologically proven breast carcinomas. MRI and prone PET-CT scans with time-of-flight and point-spread-function reconstruction were performed with the same dedicated breast coil. The studies were assessed by a radiologist and a nuclear medicine physician, and evaluation of fused images was made by consensus. The final diagnosis was based on pathology (90 lesions) or follow-up ≥ 24 months (17 lesions).

resultsThe study assessed 72 malignant and 35 benign lesions with a median size of 1.8 cm (range 0.3-8.4 cm): 31 focal, nine multifocal and nine multicentric cases. In lesion-by-lesion analysis, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were 97%, 80%, 91% and 93% for MRI, 96%, 71%, 87%, and 89% for prone PET, and 97%. 94%, 97% and 94% for MRI fused with PET. Areas under the curve (AUC) were 0.953, 0.850, and 0.983, respectively (p < 0.01).

conclusionsMRI fused with FDG-PET is more accurate than FDG-PET in primary tumour staging of breast cancer patients and increases the specificity of MRI. KEY POINTS: • FDG PET-CT may improve the specificity of MRI in breast cancer staging. • MRI fused with prone 2-[fluorine-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose PET-CT has better overall diagnostic performance than MRI. • The clinical role of fused PET-MRI has not yet been established.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBreast NeoplasmsFemaleFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPositron-Emission TomographyPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyPredictive Value of TestsProne PositionRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityFluorodeoxyglucose F18Breast cancerFDGMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI)Prone positron emission tomography computed tomography (PET-CT)Staging

Identifiers

PMID28004161
OpenAlexW2566293200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.