Trial reportDer Orthopade2017
[Endoprosthesis failure in the ankle joint : Histopathological diagnostics and classification].
Trial report in Der Orthopade, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionEndoprostheses of the ankle joint show higher revision rates of 3.29 revisions per 100 component years. The aims of this study were the application and modification of the consensus classification of the synovia-like interface membrane (SLIM) for periprosthetic failure of the ankle joint, the etiological clarification of periprosthetic pseudocysts and a detailed measurement of proliferative activity (Ki67) in the region of osteolysis. MATERIAL AND
methodTissue samples from 159 patients were examined according to the criteria of the standardized consensus classification. Of these, 117 cases were derived from periprosthetic membranes of the ankle. The control group included 42 tissue specimens from the hip and knee joints. Particle identification and characterization were carried out using the particle algorithm. An immunohistochemical examination with Ki67 proliferation was performed in all cases of ankle pseudocysts and 19 control cases.
resultsThe consensus classification of SLIM is transferrable to endoprosthetic failure of the ankle joint. Periprosthetic pseudocysts with the histopathological characteristics of the appropriate SLIM subtype were detectable in 39 cases of ankle joint endoprostheses (33.3%). The mean value of the Ki67 index was 14% and showed an increased proliferation rate in periprosthetic pseudocysts of the ankle (p-value 0.02037).
conclusionIn periprosthetic pseudocysts an above average higher detection rate of type 1 SLIM induced by abrasion (51.3%) with an increased Ki67 proliferation fraction (p-value 0.02037) was found, which can be interpreted as local destructive intraosseus synovialitis. This can be the reason for formation of pseudocystic osteolysis caused by high mechanical stress in ankle endoprostheses. A simplified diagnostic classification scoring system of dysfunctional endoprostheses of the ankle is proposed for collation of periprosthetic pseudocysts, ossifications and the Ki67 proliferation fraction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28004128What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.