Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28004119›Full record

Trial reportOncology reports2017

Yttrium-90 radioembolization for colorectal cancer liver metastases in KRAS wild-type and mutant patients: Clinical and ccfDNA studies.

E Janowski, O Timofeeva, S Chasovskikh, M Goldberg, A Kim, F Banovac, D Pang, A Dritschilo, K Unger

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Oncology reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Radioembolization of Colorectal Liver Metastases: Indications, Technique, and Outcomes.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

E JanowskiDepartment of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.
O TimofeevaDepartment of Oncology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
S ChasovskikhDepartment of Oncology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
M GoldbergDepartment of Oncology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
A KimDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.
F BanovacDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Vanderbilt University Hospital, Nashville, TN, USA.
D PangDepartment of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.
A DritschiloDepartment of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.
K UngerDepartment of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.
Georgetown University · USVanderbilt University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with unresectable, chemo-refractory colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRCLM) have limited local treatment options. We report our institutional experience on the efficacy of resin-based yttrium-90 (90Y) radioembolization for the treatment of CRCLM and our findings on associated circulating cell-free DNA (ccfDNA) studies. A total of 58 patients treated with 90Y for CRCLM at the Medstar Georgetown University Hospital had a median survival of 6 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 4.55‑7.45 months] after treatment, with a 12-month survival rate of 33%. The median survival from treatment stratified by mutational status was longer in the wild-type (WT) as compared to the KRAS mutant patients at 7 vs. 5 months, but did not achieve statistical significance (p=0.059). Median tumor local control duration after 90Y treatment was 2 months (95% CI, 0.34‑3.66 months) for the entire cohort and was longer in the WT vs. the mutant patients (2 vs. 1 month, respectively, p=0.088). Plasma was prospectively collected from a subset of 9 patients both before and after single lobe treatment, and ccfDNA concentration and fragmentation index (FI) were measured using quantitative PCR and atomic-force microscopy (AFM). In the WT and KRAS mutant patients, DNA FI was reduced from a median of 0.73-0.65 after treatment. A reduction in DNA FI after single lobe treatment was associated with an improved overall survival (p=0.046). Analysis by AFM of paired pre- and post-treatment samples from KRAS mutant and WT patients revealed a larger average decrease in fragment size in the WT patients (p=0.013). 90Y radioembolization extends local control for CRCLM, however, KRAS mutant tumors may be more radio-resistant to treatment. Changes in the FI of patients following treatment were noted and may be evaluated in a larger study for relevance as a biomarker of response.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overColorectal NeoplasmsDNAEmbolization, TherapeuticFemaleHumansLiver NeoplasmsMaleMicroscopy, Atomic ForceMiddle AgedProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)Retrospective StudiesSurvival AnalysisTreatment OutcomeDNAKRAS protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)Yttrium Radioisotopes

Identifiers

PMID28004119
PMCPMC5355723
OpenAlexW2559283291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.