Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28004041›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. CHI Conference2010

Physician-Driven Management of Patient Progress Notes in an Intensive Care Unit.

Lauren Wilcox, Jie Lu, Jennifer Lai, Steven Feiner, Desmond Jordan

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. CHI Conference, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Sketching AI Concepts with Capabilities and Examples: AI Innovation in the Intensive Care Unit.Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. CHI Conference · 2024
    Article
  4. Investigating Why Clinicians Deviate from Standards of Care: Liberating Patients from Mechanical Ventilation in the ICU.Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. CHI Conference · 2024
    Article
  5. Clinical Documentation as End-User Programming.Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. CHI Conference · 2020
    Article
  6. Observational
  7. Validating free-text order entry for a note-centric EHR.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2015
    Article
  8. Sim•TwentyFive: an interactive visualization system for data-driven decision support.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2012
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Clinical documentation: composition or synthesis?Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lauren WilcoxIBM Watson Research Center, 19 Skyline Drive ; Department of Computer Science, Columbia University.
Jie LuIBM Watson Research Center, 19 Skyline Drive.
Jennifer LaiIBM Watson Research Center, 19 Skyline Drive.
Steven FeinerDepartment of Computer Science, Columbia University.
Desmond JordanCollege of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University.
Columbia University · USIBM (United States) · US

Funding

User Interfaces for Communicating Inpatient Medication TherapiesR36HS021393 · AHRQ · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI WILCOX, LAUREN · 2012 to 2012
$43k
AHRQ HHS R36 HS021393
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We describe fieldwork in which we studied hospital ICU physicians and their strategies and documentation aids for composing patient progress notes. We then present a clinical documentation prototype, activeNotes, that supports the creation of these notes, using techniques designed based on our fieldwork. ActiveNotes integrates automated, context-sensitive patient data retrieval, and user control of automated data updates and alerts via tagging, into the documentation process. We performed a qualitative study of activeNotes with 15 physicians at the hospital to explore the utility of our information retrieval and tagging techniques. The physicians indicated their desire to use tags for a number of purposes, some of them extensions to what we intended, and others new to us and unexplored in other systems of which we are aware. We discuss the physicians' responses to our prototype and distill several of their proposed uses of tags: to assist in note content management, communication with other clinicians, and care delivery.

Indexed as

clinical documentationclinical notesH5.2 [Information Interfaces]: User Interfaces, InputI.3.6 [Methodology and techniques]: Interaction TechniquesMedical note creationmedical user interfacestags

Identifiers

PMID28004041
PMCPMC5166710
OpenAlexW2097247949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.