Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28003936›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2016

Towards quantitative viromics for both double-stranded and single-stranded DNA viruses.

Simon Roux, Natalie E Solonenko, Vinh T Dang, Bonnie T Poulos, Sarah M Schwenck, Dawn B Goldsmith, Maureen L Coleman, Mya Breitbart, Matthew B Sullivan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 119 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
119citing papers in PubMed
61.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

119 citing papers in PubMed, 229 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Hawaiian Geothermal Fumaroles Contain Diverse and Novel Viruses.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. DNA Viral Size Fraction Metagenomics for Human Stool Samples.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2026
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

59 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Simon RouxDepartment of Microbiology, The Ohio State University , Columbus , OH , United States.
Natalie E SolonenkoDepartment of Microbiology, The Ohio State University , Columbus , OH , United States.
Vinh T DangDepartment of Microbiology, Ha Long University , Uong Bi , Quang Ninh , Vietnam.
Bonnie T PoulosDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona , Tucson , AZ , United States.
Sarah M SchwenckDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona , Tucson , AZ , United States.
Dawn B GoldsmithCollege of Marine Science, University of South Florida , St. Petersburg , FL , United States.
Maureen L ColemanDepartment of the Geophysical Sciences, University of Chicago , Chicago , IL , United States.
Mya BreitbartCollege of Marine Science, University of South Florida , St. Petersburg , FL , United States.
Matthew B SullivanDepartment of Microbiology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States; Department of Civil, Environmental and Geodetic Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.
The Ohio State University · USCollege of Marin · USUniversity of Arizona · USThang Long University · VNUniversity of Chicago · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundViruses strongly influence microbial population dynamics and ecosystem functions. However, our ability to quantitatively evaluate those viral impacts is limited to the few cultivated viruses and double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) viral genomes captured in quantitative viral metagenomes (viromes). This leaves the ecology of non-dsDNA viruses nearly unknown, including single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) viruses that have been frequently observed in viromes, but not quantified due to amplification biases in sequencing library preparations (Multiple Displacement Amplification, Linker Amplification or Tagmentation).

methodsHere we designed mock viral communities including both ssDNA and dsDNA viruses to evaluate the capability of a sequencing library preparation approach including an Adaptase step prior to Linker Amplification for quantitative amplification of both dsDNA and ssDNA templates. We then surveyed aquatic samples to provide first estimates of the abundance of ssDNA viruses.

resultsMock community experiments confirmed the biased nature of existing library preparation methods for ssDNA templates (either largely enriched or selected against) and showed that the protocol using Adaptase plus Linker Amplification yielded viromes that were ±1.8-fold quantitative for ssDNA and dsDNA viruses. Application of this protocol to community virus DNA from three freshwater and three marine samples revealed that ssDNA viruses as a whole represent only a minor fraction (<5%) of DNA virus communities, though individual ssDNA genomes, both eukaryote-infecting Circular Rep-Encoding Single-Stranded DNA (CRESS-DNA) viruses and bacteriophages from the DISCUSSION: Together these findings provide empirical data for a new virome library preparation protocol, and a first estimate of ssDNA virus abundance in aquatic systems.

Indexed as

Environmental virologyssDNA virusesViral metagenomics

Identifiers

PMID28003936
PMCPMC5168678
OpenAlexW2560014131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.