Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28003868›Full record

ArticleFacts, views & vision in ObGyn2016

Outcome of one hundred consecutive ICSI attempts using patient operated home sonography for monitoring follicular growth.

J Gerris, F Vandekerckhove, P De Sutter

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Facts, views & vision in ObGyn, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J GerrisWomen's Clinic, University Hospital Ghent, De Pintelaan 185, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
F VandekerckhoveWomen's Clinic, University Hospital Ghent, De Pintelaan 185, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
P De SutterWomen's Clinic, University Hospital Ghent, De Pintelaan 185, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Ghent University Hospital · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivecohort study describing clinical and laboratory outcomes in ICSI patients using self-operated endovaginal tele-monitoring (SOET).

settingUniversity department of reproductive medicine. PATIENTS: 78 patients undergoing 100 consecutive ICSI attempts.

interventionspatients' recorded vaginal sonograms and sent recordings using the cloud based Sonaura device to the care provider who procured responses, avoiding hospital visits.

main outcome measuresNumber of cycles without hospital visit, laboratory and clinical variables, transportation avoided.

resultsIn 100 attempts, only one patient missed her follicles, 9 hospital visits occurred for circumstantial reasons and 90 attempts were completed without any hospital visit between initiation and puncture. Mean number ± 2SD was for oocytes 11.7±6.6, metaphase-II oocytes 8.5±5.4, 2PN zygotes 5.5±3.7, good day-5 blastocysts 2.4±2.4, embryos transferred 1.0±0.7 and embryos frozen 1.3±2.2. Percentages of total (+HCG), clinical (cardiac activity) and on-going pregnancies (>20 weeks) were 40%, 35% and 29% per started cycle and 48.8%, 42.7% and 35.4% per embryo transfer.

conclusionsUsing SOET, 90% of ICSI (and IVF) patients can avoid visits to care providers for making sonograms. Results were similar as in patients with a similar profile using traditional monitoring. In appropriate patients, SOET is an efficient, safe and patient-friendly alternative for ovarian stimulation monitoring in IVF/ICSI programmes.

Indexed as

ARTfollicular growth monitoringhome sonographyovarian stimulationpatient empowermenttele-medicine

Identifiers

PMID28003868
PMCPMC5172570
OpenAlexW2594527761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.