Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28003841›Full record

ArticleResearch in pharmaceutical sciences2016

Cytotoxic effects of

Najmeh Sarvmeili, Abbas Jafarian-Dehkordi, Behzad Zolfaghari

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research in pharmaceutical sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Stem bark ethanolic extract ofOpen veterinary journal · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Antioxidant Activity of Essential Oils from Pinaceae Species.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Terpenoids, Cannabimimetic Ligands, beyond theMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  11. The potency of chitosan-basedVeterinary world · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Terpenes from Forests and Human Health.Toxicological research · 2017
    Review
  16. Neuroprotective effects ofAvicenna journal of phytomedicine
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Najmeh SarvmeiliDepartment of Pharmacology & Toxicology and Isfahan Pharmaceutical Sciences Research Center, School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, I.R. Iran.
Abbas Jafarian-DehkordiDepartment of Pharmacology & Toxicology and Isfahan Pharmaceutical Sciences Research Center, School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, I.R. Iran.
Behzad ZolfaghariDepartment of Pharmacognosy and Isfahan Pharmaceutical Sciences Research Center, School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, I.R. Iran.
Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several attempts have so far been made in the search of new anticancer agents of plant origin. Some studies have reported that different species of Pine genus possess cytotoxic activities against various cancer cell lines. In the present study, we evaluated the cytotoxic effects of

Indexed as

CytotoxicityHeLaMCF-7MTT assayPinus eldarica

Identifiers

PMID28003841
PMCPMC5168884
OpenAlexW2560688833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.