Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28003410›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2017

Proximal-distal differences in movement smoothness reflect differences in biomechanics.

Layne H Salmond, Andrew D Davidson, Steven K Charles

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A survey of human shoulder functional kinematic representations.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The neural mechanisms of manual dexterity.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Estimating Movement Smoothness From Inertial Measurement Units.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Layne H SalmondDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah; and.
Andrew D DavidsonDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah; and.
Steven K CharlesDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah; and skcharles@byu.edu.
Brigham Young University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Smoothness is a hallmark of healthy movement. Past research indicates that smoothness may be a side product of a control strategy that minimizes error. However, this is not the only reason for smooth movements. Our musculoskeletal system itself contributes to movement smoothness: the mechanical impedance (inertia, damping, and stiffness) of our limbs and joints resists sudden change, resulting in a natural smoothing effect. How the biomechanics and neural control interact to result in an observed level of smoothness is not clear. The purpose of this study is to

Indexed as

RotationAdolescentAdultAnalysis of VarianceArmBiomechanical PhenomenaComputer SimulationFeedback, SensoryFemaleHumansJointsMaleModels, BiologicalMovementNonlinear DynamicsRange of Motion, Articularfilterimpedancejerkkinematicssmoothness

Identifiers

PMID28003410
PMCPMC5350272
OpenAlexW2566519232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.