Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28003348›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2017

Spatiotemporal Filter for Visual Motion Integration from Pursuit Eye Movements in Humans and Monkeys.

Trishna Mukherjee, Bing Liu, Claudio Simoncini, Leslie C Osborne

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Motion Perception in the Common Marmoset.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2020
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Beyond Trial-Based Paradigms: Continuous Behavior, Ongoing Neural Activity, and Natural Stimuli.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Trishna MukherjeeDepartment of Neurobiology and.ORCID 0000-0002-5078-1592
Bing LiuDepartment of Neurobiology and.
Claudio SimonciniDepartment of Neurobiology and.ORCID 0000-0003-0471-5735
Leslie C OsborneDepartment of Neurobiology and osborne@uchicago.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-6080-5279
Institute of Neurobiology · BGUniversity of Chicago · US

Funding

Mechanisms of efficient coding of dynamic visual motion signals for pursuitR01EY023371 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI BECK, JEFFREY M · 2014 to 2023
$2.9M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY023371
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the enduring interest in motion integration, a direct measure of the space-time filter that the brain imposes on a visual scene has been elusive. This is perhaps because of the challenge of estimating a 3D function from perceptual reports in psychophysical tasks. We take a different approach. We exploit the close connection between visual motion estimates and smooth pursuit eye movements to measure stimulus-response correlations across space and time, computing the linear space-time filter for global motion direction in humans and monkeys. Although derived from eye movements, we find that the filter predicts perceptual motion estimates quite well. To distinguish visual from motor contributions to the temporal duration of the pursuit motion filter, we recorded single-unit responses in the monkey middle temporal cortical area (MT). We find that pursuit response delays are consistent with the distribution of cortical neuron latencies and that temporal motion integration for pursuit is consistent with a short integration MT subpopulation. Remarkably, the visual system appears to preferentially weight motion signals across a narrow range of foveal eccentricities rather than uniformly over the whole visual field, with a transiently enhanced contribution from locations along the direction of motion. We find that the visual system is most sensitive to motion falling at approximately one-third the radius of the stimulus aperture. Hypothesizing that the visual drive for pursuit is related to the filtered motion energy in a motion stimulus, we compare measured and predicted eye acceleration across several other target forms.

Indexed as

AnimalsEye MovementsFemaleHumansMacaca mulattaMaleMotion PerceptionPhotic StimulationPursuit, SmoothSpace PerceptionSpecies SpecificityTime FactorsVisual Fieldslinear analysismotion perceptionsensory-motor behaviorsmooth pursuit

Identifiers

PMID28003348
PMCPMC5299399
OpenAlexW2567199138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.