Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28003321›Full record

ArticleJapanese journal of clinical oncology2017

Collaborative care intervention for the perceived care needs of women with breast cancer undergoing adjuvant therapy after surgery: a feasibility study.

Kanae Momino, Miyashita Mitsunori, Hiroko Yamashita, Tatsuya Toyama, Hiroshi Sugiura, Nobuyasu Yoshimoto, Kei Hirai, Tatsuo Akechi

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Japanese journal of clinical oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Effect of Psychological Intervention on Fear of Cancer Recurrence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2019
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Kanae MominoNagoya City University Graduate School of Nursing, Nagoya.
Miyashita MitsunoriDepartment of Palliative Nursing, Health Sciences, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai.
Hiroko YamashitaDepartment of Breast Surgery, Division of Surgery, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido.
Tatsuya ToyamaDepartment of Breast Surgery, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya.
Hiroshi SugiuraDepartment of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Nagoya City West Medical Center, Nagoya.
Nobuyasu YoshimotoDepartment of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Nagoya City West Medical Center, Nagoya.
Kei HiraiGraduate School of Human Sciences, and Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka.
Tatsuo AkechiDepartment of Psychiatry and Cognitive-Behavioral Medicine, Nagoya City University Graduate School ofMedical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.
Nagoya City University · JPNagoya Medical Center · JPHokkaido University · JPOsaka University of Human Sciences · JPTohoku University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to investigate the feasibility of an intervention program for women with breast cancer undergoing adjuvant anticancer therapy, and determine its preliminary effectiveness in reducing their unmet needs and psychological distress.

methodsThe intervention was based on the collaborative care model, and compromised four domains: identification of unmet needs, problem-solving therapy and behavioral activation supervised by a psychiatrist, psychoeducation and referral to relevant departments. Eligible women with breast cancer were provided the collaborative care intervention over four sessions. The feasibility of the program was evaluated by the percentage of women who entered the intervention and by the percentage of adherence to the program. Self-reported outcomes were measured by the Supportive Care Needs Survey-Short Form 34 (SCNS-SF34), the Profile of Mood States (POMS), the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30), the Concern about Recurrence Scale, and pre- and post-intervention satisfaction with medical care.

resultsIn total, 40 patients participated in this study. The rate of participation in the intervention was 68%, and the rate of adherence was 93%. Participants had significantly improved scores on total perceived needs, physical needs and psychological needs on the SCNS-SF34; vigor and confusion on the POMS and function (physical, emotional and cognitive), nausea and vomiting, dyspnea, appetite loss and financial difficulties on the EORTC QLQ-C30 compared with the baseline assessment.

conclusionsOur findings indicated the intervention program was feasible. Further study is needed to demonstrate the program's effectiveness in reducing unmet needs.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsChemotherapy, AdjuvantFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedQuality of LifeSurveys and Questionnairesbreast cancerclinical trialneedsproblem solving

Identifiers

PMID28003321
PMCPMC5444337
OpenAlexW2567163984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.