Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28003301›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2016

Safety and feasibility of sublingual microcirculation assessment in the emergency department for civilian and military patients with traumatic haemorrhagic shock: a prospective cohort study.

David N Naumann, Clare Mellis, Iain M Smith, Jasna Mamuza, Imogen Skene, Tim Harris, Mark J Midwinter, Sam D Hutchings

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02111109 (An Observational Pilot Study of the Effects of Traumatic Haemorrhagic Shock and Resuscitation on the Microcirculation), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02111109 completednot on this map

An Observational Pilot Study of the Effects of Traumatic Haemorrhagic Shock and Resuscitation on the Microcirculation

TypeobservationalSponsorKing's College Hospital NHS TrustRan2014 to 2017Enrolled58ConditionsTraumatic Haemorrhagic ShockArmsSide Stream Dark Field Microscopy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

David N NaumannNIHR Surgical Reconstruction and Microbiology Research Centre, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK.
Clare MellisKings College Hospital, London, UK.
Iain M SmithNIHR Surgical Reconstruction and Microbiology Research Centre, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK.
Jasna MamuzaBarts Health NHS Trust and Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Imogen SkeneBarts Health NHS Trust and Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Tim HarrisBarts Health NHS Trust and Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Mark J MidwinterRural Clinical School, University of Queensland, Bundaberg Hospital, Bundaberg, Queensland, Australia.
Sam D HutchingsKings College Hospital, London, UK.
King's College Hospital · GBQueen Mary University of London · GBBarts Health NHS Trust · GBQueen Elizabeth University Hospital · GBUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Queensland · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesSublingual microcirculatory monitoring for traumatic haemorrhagic shock (THS) may predict clinical outcomes better than traditional blood pressure and cardiac output, but is not usually performed until the patient reaches the intensive care unit (ICU), missing earlier data of potential importance. This pilot study assessed for the first time the feasibility and safety of sublingual video-microscopy for THS in the emergency department (ED), and whether it yields useable data for analysis.

settingA safety and feasibility assessment was undertaken as part of the prospective observational MICROSHOCK study; sublingual video-microscopy was performed at the UK-led Role 3 medical facility at Camp Bastion, Afghanistan, and in the ED in 3 UK Major Trauma Centres.

participantsThere were 15 casualties (2 military, 13 civilian) who presented with traumatic haemorrhagic shock with a median injury severity score of 26. The median age was 41; the majority (n=12) were male. The most common injury mechanism was road traffic accident. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Safety and feasibility were the primary outcomes, as measured by lack of adverse events or clinical interruptions, and successful acquisition and storage of data. The secondary outcome was the quality of acquired video clips according to validated criteria, in order to determine whether useful data could be obtained in this emergency context.

resultsVideo-microscopy was successfully performed and stored for analysis for all patients, yielding 161 video clips. There were no adverse events or episodes where clinical management was affected or interrupted. There were 104 (64.6%) video clips from 14 patients of sufficient quality for analysis.

conclusionsEarly sublingual microcirculatory monitoring in the ED for patients with THS is safe and feasible, even in a deployed military setting, and yields videos of satisfactory quality in a high proportion of cases. Further investigations of early microcirculatory behaviour in this context are warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02111109.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalMicrocirculationMouth FloorAdultAfghanistanEmergency Medical ServicesFeasibility StudiesFemaleHealth FacilitiesHumansInjury Severity ScoreMaleMicroscopy, VideoMiddle AgedMilitary PersonnelMonitoring, PhysiologichaemorrhageMicrocirculationshocksublingualTRAUMA MANAGEMENT

Identifiers

PMID28003301
PMCPMC5223697
OpenAlexW2561162902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.