Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28003255›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2016

Pain Tolerance in Persons With Recognized and Unrecognized Myocardial Infarction: A Population-Based, Cross-Sectional Study.

Andrea Milde Øhrn, Christopher Sivert Nielsen, Henrik Schirmer, Audun Stubhaug, Tom Wilsgaard, Haakon Lindekleiv

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Sudden Death from Ischemic Heart Disease While Driving: Cardiac Pathology, Clinical Characteristics, and Countermeasures.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Sex-Based Differences in Unrecognized Myocardial Infarction.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Andrea Milde ØhrnFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Tromsø, Norway andrea.ohrn@uit.no.
Christopher Sivert NielsenDivision of Mental Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Henrik SchirmerFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Tromsø, Norway.
Audun StubhaugDepartment of Pain Management and Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Tom WilsgaardFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Tromsø, Norway.
Haakon LindekleivFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Tromsø, Norway.
UiT The Arctic University of Norway · NONorwegian Institute of Public Health · NOOslo University Hospital · NOUniversity Hospital of North Norway · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnrecognized myocardial infarction (MI) is a prevalent condition associated with a similar risk of death as recognized MI. It is unknown why some persons experience MI with few or no symptoms; however, one possible explanation is attenuated pain sensitivity. To our knowledge, no previous study has examined the association between pain sensitivity and recognition of MI. METHODS AND

resultsWe conducted a population-based cross-sectional study with 4849 included participants who underwent the cold pressor test (a common experimental pain assay) and ECG. Unrecognized MI was present in 387 (8%) and recognized MI in 227 (4.7%) participants. Participants with unrecognized MI endured the cold pressor test significantly longer than participants with recognized MI (hazard ratio for aborting the cold pressor test, 0.64; CI, 0.47-0.88), adjusted for age and sex. The association was attenuated and borderline significant after multivariable adjustment. The association between unrecognized MI and lower pain sensitivity was stronger in women than in men, and statistically significant in women only, but interaction testing was not statistically significant (P for interaction=0.14).

conclusionsOur findings suggest that persons who experience unrecognized MI have reduced pain sensitivity compared with persons who experience recognized MI. This may partially explain the lack of symptoms associated with unrecognized MI.

Indexed as

Diagnostic ErrorsElectrocardiographyPain ThresholdPopulation SurveillanceAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionNorwayPainepidemiologymyocardial infarctionpain tolerancesilent myocardial infarctionunrecognized myocardial infarction

Identifiers

PMID28003255
PMCPMC5210406
OpenAlexW2564915141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.