Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28003022›Full record

ArticleGenome medicine2016

The variability and reproducibility of whole genome sequencing technology for detecting resistance to anti-tuberculous drugs.

Jody Phelan, Denise M O'Sullivan, Diana Machado, Jorge Ramos, Alexandra S Whale, Justin O'Grady, Keertan Dheda, Susana Campino, Ruth McNerney, Miguel Viveiros and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Open-access genomic drug resistance prediction tools forJournal of clinical microbiology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The T120P or M172V mutation onEmerging microbes & infections · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Effectiveness of GenoType MTBDRThe international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Jody PhelanDepartment of Pathogen Molecular Biology, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, WC1E 7HT, London, UK.
Denise M O'SullivanMolecular Biology, LGC Ltd, Queens Road, Teddington, Middlesex, TW11 0LY, UK.
Diana MachadoUnidade de Microbiologia Médica, Global Health and Tropical Medicine, GHTM, Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical, IHMT, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, UNL, Lisbon, Portugal.
Jorge RamosUnidade de Microbiologia Médica, Global Health and Tropical Medicine, GHTM, Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical, IHMT, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, UNL, Lisbon, Portugal.
Alexandra S WhaleMolecular Biology, LGC Ltd, Queens Road, Teddington, Middlesex, TW11 0LY, UK.
Justin O'GradyNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK.
Keertan DhedaDivision of Pulmonary Medicine and UCT Lung Institute, Lung Infection and Immunity Unit, University of Cape Town, Groote Schuur Hospital, Observatory, 7925, Cape Town, South Africa.
Susana CampinoDepartment of Pathogen Molecular Biology, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, WC1E 7HT, London, UK.
Ruth McNerneyDivision of Pulmonary Medicine and UCT Lung Institute, Lung Infection and Immunity Unit, University of Cape Town, Groote Schuur Hospital, Observatory, 7925, Cape Town, South Africa.
Miguel ViveirosUnidade de Microbiologia Médica, Global Health and Tropical Medicine, GHTM, Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical, IHMT, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, UNL, Lisbon, Portugal.
Jim F HuggettMolecular Biology, LGC Ltd, Queens Road, Teddington, Middlesex, TW11 0LY, UK.
Taane G ClarkDepartment of Pathogen Molecular Biology, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, WC1E 7HT, London, UK. taane.clark@lshtm.ac.uk.
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBUniversidade Nova de Lisboa · PTUniversity of Cape Town · ZAUniversity of East Anglia · GBUniversity of Surrey · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K000551/1Medical Research Council MR/M01360X/1Medical Research Council MR/N010469/1Medical Research Council MR/N013956/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe emergence of resistance to anti-tuberculosis drugs is a serious and growing threat to public health. Next-generation sequencing is rapidly gaining traction as a diagnostic tool for investigating drug resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis to aid treatment decisions. However, there are few little data regarding the precision of such sequencing for assigning resistance profiles.

methodsWe investigated two sequencing platforms (Illumina MiSeq, Ion Torrent PGM™) and two rapid analytic pipelines (TBProfiler, Mykrobe predictor) using a well characterised reference strain (H37Rv) and clinical isolates from patients with tuberculosis resistant to up to 13 drugs. Results were compared to phenotypic drug susceptibility testing. To assess analytical robustness individual DNA samples were subjected to repeated sequencing.

resultsThe MiSeq and Ion PGM systems accurately predicted drug-resistance profiles and there was high reproducibility between biological and technical sample replicates. Estimated variant error rates were low (MiSeq 1 per 77 kbp, Ion PGM 1 per 41 kbp) and genomic coverage high (MiSeq 51-fold, Ion PGM 53-fold). MiSeq provided superior coverage in GC-rich regions, which translated into incremental detection of putative genotypic drug-specific resistance, including for resistance to para-aminosalicylic acid and pyrazinamide. The TBProfiler bioinformatics pipeline was concordant with reported phenotypic susceptibility for all drugs tested except pyrazinamide and para-aminosalicylic acid, with an overall concordance of 95.3%. When using the Mykrobe predictor concordance with phenotypic testing was 73.6%.

conclusionsWe have demonstrated high comparative reproducibility of two sequencing platforms, and high predictive ability of the TBProfiler mutation library and analytical pipeline, when profiling resistance to first- and second-line anti-tuberculosis drugs. However, platform-specific variability in coverage of some genome regions may have implications for predicting resistance to specific drugs. These findings may have implications for future clinical practice and thus deserve further scrutiny, set within larger studies and using updated mutation libraries.

Indexed as

Antitubercular AgentsGenome, BacterialHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingDrug Resistance, BacterialHumansMycobacterium tuberculosisSequence Analysis, DNAAntitubercular AgentsDiagnosticsDrug resistanceDrug-susceptibility testingNext-generation sequencingTuberculosisXDR-TB

Identifiers

PMID28003022
PMCPMC5178084
OpenAlexW2564239943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.