Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28002732›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2016

Methyl-CpG/MBD2 Interaction Requires Minimum Separation and Exhibits Minimal Sequence Specificity.

Blythe Moreland, Kenji Oman, John Curfman, Pearlly Yan, Ralf Bundschuh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Blythe MorelandDepartment of Physics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Kenji OmanDepartment of Physics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
John CurfmanDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Pearlly YanDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Ralf BundschuhDepartment of Physics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio; Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio; Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio; Center for RNA Biology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio. Electronic address: bundschuh@mps.ohio-state.edu.

Funding

Translational Therapeutics Research Program (TT)P30CA016058 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Tasleem J Padamsee · 1985 to 2026
$132.3M
Ultra-Low and Single-Cell Transcriptome Analysis in Patient-Derived Rare CLL Precursor CellsR50CA211524 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI YAN, PEARLLY · 2016 to 2020
$745k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016058NCI NIH HHS R50 CA211524
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Determining the pattern of methylation at CpG dinucleotides in a cell remains an essential component of epigenetic profiling. The correlations among methylation, gene expression, and accompanying disease have just begun to be explored. Many experiments for sensing methylation use a relatively inexpensive, high-throughput approach with a methyl-binding domain (MBD) protein that preferentially binds to methylated CpGs. Here, we characterize the cooperativity and sequence specificity of MBD2-DNA binding in a pulldown experiment revealing three potential biases in such experiments. The first is caused by steric clashes between two MBD2 proteins at mCpGs separated by 2 bp or less, which suggests that simultaneous binding at these sites is inhibited. This is confirmed by comparing input versus pulldown high-throughput sequencing data on M.SssI-treated samples, from which we also find that pulldown efficiency sharply increases for DNA fragments with four or more mCpGs. Analysis of these two data sets was again employed to investigate MBD2's sequence preferences surrounding a methylated CpG (mCpG). In comparing the distributions of bases at positions with respect to an mCpG, statistically significant preferences for certain bases were found, although the corresponding biases in pulldown efficiency were all <5%. While this suggests that mCpG sequence context can mostly be ignored in MBD2 binding, the statistical certainty exhibited by our high-throughput approach bodes well for future applications.

Indexed as

Base SequenceCpG IslandsDNADNA-Binding ProteinsMethylationModels, MolecularNucleic Acid ConformationProtein BindingSubstrate SpecificityDNADNA-Binding ProteinsMBD2 protein

Identifiers

PMID28002732
PMCPMC5192688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.