Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28002683›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of respiratory and critical care medicine2017

A Prediction Model to Help with the Assessment of Adenopathy in Lung Cancer: HAL.

Oisin J O'Connell, Francisco A Almeida, Michael J Simoff, Lonny Yarmus, Ray Lazarus, Benjamin Young, Yu Chen, Roy Semaan, Timothy M Saettele, Joseph Cicenia and 16 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. A Prediction Model to Help with Oncologic Mediastinal Evaluation for Radiation: HOMER.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

Oisin J O'Connell1 Department of Pulmonary Medicine and.
Francisco A Almeida2 Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Michael J Simoff3 Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan; and.
Lonny Yarmus4 Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Ray Lazarus1 Department of Pulmonary Medicine and.
Benjamin Young2 Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Yu Chen3 Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan; and.
Roy Semaan3 Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan; and.
Timothy M Saettele1 Department of Pulmonary Medicine and.
Joseph Cicenia2 Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Harmeet Bedi3 Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan; and.
Corrine Kliment4 Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Liang Li5 Department of Biostatistics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Sonali Sethi2 Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Javier Diaz-Mendoza3 Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan; and.
David Feller-Kopman4 Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Juhee Song5 Department of Biostatistics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Thomas Gildea2 Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Hans Lee4 Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Horiana B Grosu1 Department of Pulmonary Medicine and.
Michael Machuzak2 Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Macarena Rodriguez-Vial1 Department of Pulmonary Medicine and.
George A Eapen1 Department of Pulmonary Medicine and.
Carlos A Jimenez1 Department of Pulmonary Medicine and.
Roberto F Casal1 Department of Pulmonary Medicine and.
David E Ost1 Department of Pulmonary Medicine and.ORCID 0000-0001-6351-5552

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleEstimating the probability of finding N2 or N3 (prN2/3) malignant nodal disease on endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) can facilitate the selection of subsequent management strategies.

objectivesTo develop a clinical prediction model for estimating the prN2/3.

methodsWe used the AQuIRE (American College of Chest Physicians Quality Improvement Registry, Evaluation, and Education) registry to identify patients with NSCLC with clinical radiographic stage T1-3, N0-3, M0 disease that had EBUS-TBNA for staging. The dependent variable was the presence of N2 or N3 disease (vs. N0 or N1) as assessed by EBUS-TBNA. Univariate followed by multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to develop a parsimonious clinical prediction model to estimate prN2/3. External validation was performed using data from three other hospitals. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsThe model derivation cohort (n = 633) had a 25% prevalence of malignant N2 or N3 disease. Younger age, central location, adenocarcinoma histology, and higher positron emission tomography-computed tomography N stage were associated with a higher prN2/3. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.85 (95% confidence interval, 0.82-0.89), model fit was acceptable (Hosmer-Lemeshow, P = 0.62; Brier score, 0.125). We externally validated the model in 722 patients. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.88 (95% confidence interval, 0.85-0.90). Calibration using the general calibration model method resulted in acceptable goodness of fit (Hosmer-Lemeshow test, P = 0.54; Brier score, 0.132).

conclusionsOur prediction rule can be used to estimate prN2/3 in patients with NSCLC. The model has the potential to facilitate clinical decision making in the staging of NSCLC.

Indexed as

Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle AspirationAgedCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsLymphadenopathyLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesMalePredictive Value of TestsRetrospective Studiesendobronchial ultrasoundlung cancerlung cancer stagingmediastinal adenopathy

Identifiers

PMID28002683
PMCPMC5476908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.