ArticlePloS one2016
Space Use and Habitat Selection by Resident and Transient Red Wolves (Canis rufus).
Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.
- Historical and current distribution ranges of the Asiatic black bear (Ursus thibetanus).Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Habitat selection of resident and non-resident gray wolves: implications for habitat connectivity.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Anthropogenic activities and age class mediate carnivore habitat selection in a human-dominated landscape.iScience · 2023Article
- The natural history and ecology of melanism in red wolf and coyote populations of the southeastern United States - evidence for Gloger's rule.BMC zoology · 2022Article
- Evaluating how management policies affect red wolf mortality and disappearance.Royal Society open science · 2022Article
- Article
- Implications of landscape genetics and connectivity of snow leopard in the Nepalese Himalayas for its conservation.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Multiscale consensus habitat modeling for landscape level conservation prioritization.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Subsidies from anthropogenic resources alter diet, activity, and ranging behavior of an apex predator (Canis lupus).Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Is the Red Wolf a Listable Unit Under the US Endangered Species Act?The Journal of heredity · 2018Article
- Size-assortative choice and mate availability influences hybridization between red wolves (Ecology and evolution · 2018Article
- Home range size, vegetation density, and season influences prey use by coyotes (Canis latrans).PloS one · 2018Article
- Habitat suitability and movement corridors of grey wolf (Canis lupus) in Northern Pakistan.PloS one · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recovery of large carnivores remains a challenge because complex spatial dynamics that facilitate population persistence are poorly understood. In particular, recovery of the critically endangered red wolf (Canis rufus) has been challenging because of its vulnerability to extinction via human-caused mortality and hybridization with coyotes (Canis latrans). Therefore, understanding red wolf space use and habitat selection is important to assist recovery because key aspects of wolf ecology such as interspecific competition, foraging, and habitat selection are well-known to influence population dynamics and persistence. During 2009-2011, we used global positioning system (GPS) radio-telemetry to quantify space use and 3rd-order habitat selection for resident and transient red wolves on the Albemarle Peninsula of eastern North Carolina. The Albemarle Peninsula was a predominantly agricultural landscape in which red wolves maintained spatially stable home ranges that varied between 25 km2 and 190 km2. Conversely, transient red wolves did not maintain home ranges and traversed areas between 122 km2 and 681 km2. Space use by transient red wolves was not spatially stable and exhibited shifting patterns until residency was achieved by individual wolves. Habitat selection was similar between resident and transient red wolves in which agricultural habitats were selected over forested habitats. However, transients showed stronger selection for edges and roads than resident red wolves. Behaviors of transient wolves are rarely reported in studies of space use and habitat selection because of technological limitations to observed extensive space use and because they do not contribute reproductively to populations. Transients in our study comprised displaced red wolves and younger dispersers that competed for limited space and mating opportunities. Therefore, our results suggest that transiency is likely an important life-history strategy for red wolves that facilitates metapopulation dynamics through short- and long-distance movements and eventual replacement of breeding residents lost to mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.