Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28002493›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

About the Sterilization of Chitosan Hydrogel Nanoparticles.

Raquel Galante, Carolina F Rediguieri, Irene Satiko Kikuchi, Pablo A S Vasquez, Rogério Colaço, Ana Paula Serro, Terezinha J A Pinto

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Thermosensitive Chitosan-Advances in pharmacological and pharmaceutical sciences · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Lawsone-loaded Niosome and its antitumor activity in MCF-7 breast Cancer cell line: a Nano-herbal treatment for Cancer.Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences · 2018
    Article
  18. The role of nanomaterials in cell delivery systems.Medical molecular morphology · 2018
    Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Raquel GalanteDepartamento de Farmácia, Faculdade de Ciências Farmacêuticas-Universidade de São Paulo, Butantã, São Paulo, Brazil.
Carolina F RediguieriDepartamento de Farmácia, Faculdade de Ciências Farmacêuticas-Universidade de São Paulo, Butantã, São Paulo, Brazil.
Irene Satiko KikuchiDepartamento de Farmácia, Faculdade de Ciências Farmacêuticas-Universidade de São Paulo, Butantã, São Paulo, Brazil.
Pablo A S VasquezCentro de Tecnologia das Radiações-Instituto de Pesquisas Energéticas e Nucleares, Butantã, São Paulo, Brazil.
Rogério ColaçoCentro de Química Estrutural, Instituto Superior Técnico-Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.
Ana Paula SerroCentro de Química Estrutural, Instituto Superior Técnico-Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6179-9296
Terezinha J A PintoDepartamento de Farmácia, Faculdade de Ciências Farmacêuticas-Universidade de São Paulo, Butantã, São Paulo, Brazil.
Universidade de São Paulo · BRUniversity of Lisbon · PTInstituto de Engenharia de Sistemas e Computadores Investigação e Desenvolvimento · PTInstituto de Pesquisas Energéticas e Nucleares · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the last years, nanostructured biomaterials have raised a great interest as platforms for delivery of drugs, genes, imaging agents and for tissue engineering applications. In particular, hydrogel nanoparticles (HNP) associate the distinctive features of hydrogels (high water uptake capacity, biocompatibility) with the advantages of being possible to tailor its physicochemical properties at nano-scale to increase solubility, immunocompatibility and cellular uptake. In order to be safe, HNP for biomedical applications, such as injectable or ophthalmic formulations, must be sterile. Literature is very scarce with respect to sterilization effects on nanostructured systems, and even more in what concerns HNP. This work aims to evaluate the effect and effectiveness of different sterilization methods on chitosan (CS) hydrogel nanoparticles. In addition to conventional methods (steam autoclave and gamma irradiation), a recent ozone-based method of sterilization was also tested. A model chitosan-tripolyphosphate (TPP) hydrogel nanoparticles (CS-HNP), with a broad spectrum of possible applications was produced and sterilized in the absence and in the presence of protective sugars (glucose and mannitol). Properties like size, zeta potential, absorbance, morphology, chemical structure and cytotoxicity were evaluated. It was found that the CS-HNP degrade by autoclaving and that sugars have no protective effect. Concerning gamma irradiation, the formation of agglomerates was observed, compromising the suspension stability. However, the nanoparticles resistance increases considerably in the presence of the sugars. Ozone sterilization did not lead to significant physical adverse effects, however, slight toxicity signs were observed, contrarily to gamma irradiation where no detectable changes on cells were found. Ozonation in the presence of sugars avoided cytotoxicity. Nevertheless, some chemical alterations were observed in the nanoparticles.

Indexed as

AnimalsCarbohydratesCell LineCell SurvivalChitosanElectric ConductivityGamma RaysHot TemperatureHydrogel, Polyethylene Glycol DimethacrylateMiceMicroscopy, Electron, TransmissionNanoparticlesOzoneParticle SizeProtective AgentsSpectrophotometry, UltravioletCarbohydratesChitosanHydrogel, Polyethylene Glycol DimethacrylateOzoneProtective Agents

Identifiers

PMID28002493
PMCPMC5176313
OpenAlexW2565634983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.