ArticlePloS one2016
Long-Term Transcriptomic Effects of Prebiotics and Synbiotics Delivered In Ovo in Broiler Chickens.
Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.
- Kinglet in the Poultry Court of Russia: Whole-Genome Insights into Ancestry, Genetic Variability, Selection Footprints and Candidate Genes in a Unique Local Chicken Breed Relative to Other Bantam/Dwarf Breeds.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Gut microbiota profile, potential engineering techniques and its genetic and epigenetic implications in poultry health.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2025Review
- Effects of in ovo stimulation with potential epigenetic modulators on immune system phenotype across three generations in a chicken model.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Effects of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum and Galactooligosaccharide Administered In Ovo on Hatchability, Chick Quality, Performance, Caecal Histomorphology and Meat Quality Traits of Broiler Chickens.Journal of animal physiology and animal nutrition · 2025Article
- Modulation of gene expression in immune-related organs by in ovo stimulation with probiotics and prophybiotics in broiler chickens.Journal of applied genetics · 2025Article
- Genotype-associated heritable rumen bacteria can be a stable microbiota passed to the offspring.ISME communications · 2024Article
- Changes in the gene expression and methylation in chicken cecal tonsils after in ovo administration of bioactive substances.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- MicroRNA expression in immune tissues of adult chickens after embryo stimulation with bioactive substances.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Physiological effects ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2023Review
- Quantitative Proteomic Analysis Reveals Yeast Cell Wall Products Influence the Serum Proteome Composition of Broiler Chickens.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Microbiota and Transcriptomic Effects of an Essential Oil Blend and Its Delivery Route Compared to an Antibiotic Growth Promoter in Broiler Chickens.Microorganisms · 2022Article
- Article
- Managing Gut Microbiota through In Ovo Nutrition Influences Early-Life Programming in Broiler Chickens.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021Review
- Epigenetic changes in poultry due to reprogramming of the gut microbiota.Animal frontiers : the review magazine of animal agriculture · 2021Article
- Modulation of Intestinal Histology by Probiotics, Prebiotics and Synbiotics Delivered In Ovo in Distinct Chicken Genotypes.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021Article
- Interaction between early in ovo stimulation of the gut microbiota and chicken host - splenic changes in gene expression and methylation.Journal of animal science and biotechnology · 2021Article
- Chicken embryo as a model in epigenetic research.Poultry science · 2021Review
- Article
- Genotype-dependent development of cellular and humoral immunity in the spleen and cecal tonsils of chickens stimulated in ovo with bioactive compounds.Poultry science · 2020Article
- Effects of Bacillus cereus PAS38 on Immune-Related Differentially Expressed Genes of Spleen in Broilers.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In ovo delivery of prebiotics and synbiotics in chickens allows for the development of intestinal microflora prior to hatching, which boosts their robustness. The goal of this study was to determine the transcriptomic profile of the spleen (S), cecal tonsils (CT), and large intestine (LI) of adult chickens injected with prebiotics and synbiotics in ovo. On day 12 of embryo development, incubating eggs were injected with prebiotics: inulin alone (P1) or in combination with Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis IBB2955 (S1), galactooligosaccharides (GOS) alone (P2) or in combination with Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris IBB477 (S2); control group (C) was mock injected with physiological saline. Gene expression analysis was conducted using an Affymetrix Chicken Gene 1.1 ST Array Strip. Most of the differentially expressed genes (DEG) were detected in the cecal tonsils of P2 (378 DEG), and were assigned to gene ontology categories: lymphocyte proliferation, activation and differentiation, and cytokine production. Ingenuity pathway analysis of the DEG (CT of P2) indicated the inhibition of humoral and cellular immune responses, e.g., role of NFAT in regulation of immune responses, phagocytosis, production of nitric oxide, NF-κB, IL-8, and CXCR4 signaling. The DEG with the highest up-regulation from S1 and P2 were involved in gene expression (PAPOLA, RPL27A, RPLP1, and RPS29) from P1 and P2 in transport (BEST4, SLC9A3, and SLC13A2), metabolism (OGT, ALPP, CA4, and CA7), signaling (FGG, G3BP2, UBB, G3BP2, CACNA1G, and ATP6V0A4), and immune responses (MSMB, LGALS3, CABIN1, CXCR5, PAX5, and TNFRSF14). Two DEG influencing the complement system (SERPING1 and MIR1674) were down-regulated in P2 and S1. In conclusion, GOS injected in ovo provided the most potent stimulation of the host transcriptome. This is likely due to its strong bifidogenic effect, which triggers proliferation of indigenous embryonic microflora in ovo, and indirectly influences gene expression regulation in host tissues, especially cecal tonsils.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.