SynthesisPloS one2016
How Are Gender Equality and Human Rights Interventions Included in Sexual and Reproductive Health Programmes and Policies: A Systematic Review of Existing Research Foci and Gaps.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- How effects on health equity are assessed in systematic reviews of interventions.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022Pooled it
- Sex Education in the Spotlight: What Is Working? Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Pooled it
- A review of measures of women's empowerment and related gender constructs in family planning and maternal health program evaluations in low- and middle-income countries.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2017Pooled it
- Husbands' knowledge of women's reproductive rights and its associated factors in Gacho Baba District, Southern Ethiopia, 2023: a rights-based approach to male engagement.Reproductive health · 2026Article
- Locating Men in Sexual and Reproductive Health, Rights, and Justice: Past, Present, Futures.Studies in family planning · 2025Article
- Article
- Men's involvement in women's abortion-related care: a scoping review of evidence from low- and middle-income countries.Sexual and reproductive health matters · 2022Article
- The human right to safely give birth: data from 193 countries show that gender equality does affect maternal mortality.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2022Article
- A summative content analysis of how programmes to improve the right to sexual and reproductive health address power.BMJ global health · 2022Article
- Healthcare professionals' experiences and perceptions regarding health care of indigenous pregnant women in Ecuador.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2022Article
- Exploring system drivers of gender inequity in development assistance for health and opportunities for action.Gates open research · 2022Article
- Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals on the academic research agenda. A scientometric analysis.PloS one · 2022Article
- Integrating human rights into sexual and reproductive health research: moving beyond the rhetoric, what will it take to get us there?Sexual and reproductive health matters · 2021Article
- Inclusion of human rights in sexual and reproductive health programming: Facilitators and barriers to implementation.Global public health · 2021Review
- The integration of sex and gender considerations in health policymaking: a scoping review.International journal for equity in health · 2021Article
- Article
- Article
- "Righting the wrongs": addressing human rights and gender equality through research since Cairo.Sexual and reproductive health matters · 2019Article
- Awareness and perceptions of women regarding human rights related to maternal health in rural Bangladesh.Journal of global health · 2019Article
- The Extent to Which Performance-Based Financing Programs' Operations Manuals Reflect Rights-Based Principles: Implications for Family Planning Services.Global health, science and practice · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The importance of promoting gender equality and human rights in sexual and reproductive health (SRH) programmes and policies has been affirmed in numerous international and regional agreements, most recently the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Given the critical role of research to determine what works, we aimed to identify research gaps as part of a broader priority setting exercise on integrating gender equality and human rights approaches in SRH programmes and policies. A systematic literature review of reviews was conducted to examine the question: what do we know about how research in the context of SRH programmes and policies has addressed gender equality and human rights and what are the current gaps in research. We searched three databases for reviews that addressed the research question, were published between 1994-2014, and met methodological standards for systematic reviews, qualitative meta-syntheses and other reviews of relevance to the research question. Additional grey literature was identified based on expert input. Articles were appraised by the primary author and examined by an expert panel. An abstraction and thematic analysis process was used to synthesize findings. Of the 3,073 abstracts identified, 56 articles were reviewed in full and 23 were included along with 10 from the grey literature. The majority focused on interventions addressing gender inequalities; very few reviews explicitly included human rights based interventions. Across both topics, weak study designs and use of intermediate outcome measures limited evidence quality. Further, there was limited evidence on interventions that addressed marginalized groups. Better quality studies, longer-term indicators, and measurement of unintended consequences are needed to better understand the impact of these types of interventions on SRH outcomes. Further efforts are needed to cover research on gender equality and human rights issues as they pertain to a broader set of SRH topics and populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.