Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28000917›Full record

ArticleJournal of the experimental analysis of behavior2017

Simulating demand for cigarettes among pregnant women: A Low-Risk method for studying vulnerable populations.

Stephen T Higgins, Derek D Reed, Ryan Redner, Joan M Skelly, Ivori A Zvorsky, Allison N Kurti

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Evaluation of Sex Differences in the Elasticity of Demand for Nicotine and Food in Rats.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2020
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Perspectives on behavior science · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Stephen T HigginsVermont Center on Behavior and Health.
Derek D ReedDepartment of Applied Behavioral Science, University of Kansas.
Ryan RednerBehavior Analysis and Therapy Program, Rehabilitation Institute Southern Illinois University.
Joan M SkellyDepartment Of Medical Biostatistics, University of Vermont.
Ivori A ZvorskyVermont Center on Behavior and Health.
Allison N KurtiVermont Center on Behavior and Health.
University of Vermont · USSouthern New England Rehabilitation Center · USUniversity of Kansas · USUniversity of Vermont Medical Center · US

Funding

Vermont Center on Behavior and HealthP20GM103644 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT & ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI KHADANGA, SHERRIE · 2013 to 2022
$21.3M
Vermont Center on Tobacco Regulatory ScienceP50DA036114 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT & ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI HIGGINS, STEPHEN T · 2013 to 2017
$19.1M
TRAINING IN BEHAV. PHARMACOLOGY OF HUMAN DRUG DEPENDENCET32DA007242 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT &ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI HEIL, SARAH H, HIGGINS, STEPHEN T · 1990 to 2025
$8.2M
Financial Incentives for Smoking Cessation Among Disadvantaged Pregnant WomenR01HD075669 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT & ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI HIGGINS, STEPHEN T · 2013 to 2017
$3.6M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD075669NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA036114NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA007242NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103644
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A substantive obstacle to experimentally studying cigarette smoking and use of other tobacco products in pregnant women is the risk of adverse effects on mother and fetus from experimenter administration of the product of interest. The purpose of this study is to investigate bypassing that obstacle by using behavioral economic simulation tasks. In the present study we used the Cigarette Purchase Task (CPT) to simulate changes in demand for hypothetical cigarettes as a function of varying cigarette prices. Participants were 95 pregnant women who completed the CPT prior to participation in a smoking-cessation trial. Aggregate and individual participant demand varied as an orderly function of price and those changes were well fitted by an exponential equation. Demand also varied in correspondence to two well-validated predictors of individual differences in smoking cessation among pregnant women (cigarettes smoked per day, pre-pregnancy quit attempts). Moreover, CPT indices were more effective than these two conventional variables in predicting individual differences in whether women made a quit attempt during the current pregnancy. Overall, these results represent a promising step in demonstrating the validity and utility of the CPT for experimentally examining demand for cigarettes, and potentially other tobacco and nicotine delivery products, among pregnant women.

Indexed as

AdultEconomics, BehavioralFemaleHumansPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsSmokingSmoking CessationTobacco Productsbehavioral economicsCigarette Purchase Taskcigarette smokingpregnant womenquit attemptssmoking ratetranslational science

Identifiers

PMID28000917
PMCPMC5322444
OpenAlexW2564579070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.