Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28000793›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

Root transcriptome of two contrasting indica rice cultivars uncovers regulators of root development and physiological responses.

Alka Singh, Pramod Kumar, Vibhav Gautam, Balakrishnan Rengasamy, Bijan Adhikari, Makarla Udayakumar, Ananda K Sarkar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Identification of tomato root growth regulatory genes and transcription factors through comparative transcriptomic profiling of different tissues.Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2021
    Article
  9. Root-Derived Endophytic Diazotrophic BacteriaFrontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alka SinghNational Institute of Plant Genome Research, Aruna Asaf Ali Marg, New Delhi 110067, India.
Pramod KumarNational Institute of Plant Genome Research, Aruna Asaf Ali Marg, New Delhi 110067, India.
Vibhav GautamNational Institute of Plant Genome Research, Aruna Asaf Ali Marg, New Delhi 110067, India.
Balakrishnan RengasamyNational Institute of Plant Genome Research, Aruna Asaf Ali Marg, New Delhi 110067, India.
Bijan AdhikariRice Research Station, Chinsurah, West Bengal 712101, India.
Makarla UdayakumarDepartment of Crop Physiology, University of Agricultural Sciences, GKVK, Bangalore 560065, India.
Ananda K SarkarNational Institute of Plant Genome Research, Aruna Asaf Ali Marg, New Delhi 110067, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The huge variation in root system architecture (RSA) among different rice (Oryza sativa) cultivars is conferred by their genetic makeup and different growth or climatic conditions. Unlike model plant Arabidopsis, the molecular basis of such variation in RSA is very poorly understood in rice. Cultivars with stable variation are valuable resources for identification of genes involved in RSA and related physiological traits. We have screened for RSA and identified two such indica rice cultivars, IR-64 (OsAS83) and IET-16348 (OsAS84), with stable contrasting RSA. OsAS84 produces robust RSA with more crown roots, lateral roots and root hairs than OsAS83. Using comparative root transcriptome analysis of these cultivars, we identified genes related to root development and different physiological responses like abiotic stress responses, hormone signaling, and nutrient acquisition or transport. The two cultivars differ in their response to salinity/dehydration stresses, phosphate/nitrogen deficiency, and different phytohormones. Differential expression of genes involved in salinity or dehydration response, nitrogen (N) transport, phosphate (Pi) starvation signaling, hormone signaling and root development underlies more resistance of OsAS84 towards abiotic stresses, Pi or N deficiency and its robust RSA. Thus our study uncovers gene-network involved in root development and abiotic stress responses in rice.

Indexed as

TranscriptomeDown-RegulationFlowersNitrogenOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisOryzaPhosphatesPlant Growth RegulatorsPlant ProteinsPlant RootsPlant ShootsSignal TransductionStress, PhysiologicalTranscription FactorsUp-RegulationNitrogenPhosphatesPlant Growth RegulatorsPlant ProteinsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID28000793
PMCPMC5175279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.