Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28000776›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

Cpf1 Is A Versatile Tool for CRISPR Genome Editing Across Diverse Species of Cyanobacteria.

Justin Ungerer, Himadri B Pakrasi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 135 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
135citing papers in PubMed
14.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

135 citing papers in PubMed, 310 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Improving the Transformation Efficiency ofACS synthetic biology · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Cryo-EM structure of cyanopodophage A4 reveals a pentameric pre-ejectosome in the double-stabilized capsid.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

75 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Justin UngererDepartment of Biology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63130 USA.
Himadri B PakrasiDepartment of Biology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63130 USA.
Washington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cyanobacteria are the ideal organisms for the production of a wide range of bioproducts as they can convert CO

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsGene EditingAnabaenaBacterial ProteinsCarbon DioxideCatalytic DomainCodon, InitiatorCyanobacteriaEndonucleasesGene DeletionGenetic EngineeringLuminescent ProteinsMicroscopy, FluorescenceMutationNitrogenasePlasmidsBacterial ProteinsCarbon DioxideCodon, InitiatorEndonucleasesLuminescent ProteinsNitrogenaseyellow fluorescent protein, Bacteria

Identifiers

PMID28000776
PMCPMC5175191
OpenAlexW2563521043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.