Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28000426›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2017

Outcome after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in Asian breast cancer patients.

Li Yan Lim, Hui Miao, Joline S J Lim, Soo Chin Lee, Nirmala Bhoo-Pathy, Cheng Har Yip, Nur Aishah B M Taib, Patrick Chan, Ern Yu Tan, Swee Ho Lim and 10 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Extent of resection in breast conserving surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a literature review.Translational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Li Yan LimDepartment of Surgery, National University Health System, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore.
Hui MiaoSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Tahir Foundation Building, 12 Science Drive 2, Singapore, 117549, Singapore.
Joline S J LimDepartment of Hematology Oncology, National University Health System, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore.
Soo Chin LeeDepartment of Hematology Oncology, National University Health System, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore.
Nirmala Bhoo-PathyJulius Centre University Malaya, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, 50603, Malaysia.
Cheng Har YipDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, 50603, Malaysia.
Nur Aishah B M TaibDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, 50603, Malaysia.
Patrick ChanDepartment of Surgery, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, 11 Jalan Tan Tock Seng, Singapore, 308433, Singapore.
Ern Yu TanDepartment of Surgery, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, 11 Jalan Tan Tock Seng, Singapore, 308433, Singapore.
Swee Ho LimBreast Department, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, 100 Bukit Timah Road, Singapore, 229899, Singapore.
Geok Hoon LimBreast Department, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, 100 Bukit Timah Road, Singapore, 229899, Singapore.
Evan WooBreast Department, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, 100 Bukit Timah Road, Singapore, 229899, Singapore.
Yia Swam TanBreast Department, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, 100 Bukit Timah Road, Singapore, 229899, Singapore.
Jung Ah LeeBreast Department, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, 100 Bukit Timah Road, Singapore, 229899, Singapore.
Mabel WongDepartment of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Drive, Singapore, 169610, Singapore.
Puay Hoon TanDepartment of Pathology, Singapore General Hospital, 20 College Road, Singapore, 169856, Singapore.
Kong Wee OngDivision of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Drive, Singapore, 169610, Singapore.
Fuh Yong WongDivision of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Drive, Singapore, 169610, Singapore.
Yoon Sim YapBreast Department, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, 100 Bukit Timah Road, Singapore, 229899, Singapore.
Mikael HartmanSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Tahir Foundation Building, 12 Science Drive 2, Singapore, 117549, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We aim to identify clinicopathologic predictors for response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and to evaluate the prognostic value of pathologic complete response (pCR) on survival in Asia. This study included 915 breast cancer patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy at five public hospitals in Singapore and Malaysia. pCR following neoadjuvant chemotherapy was defined as 1) no residual invasive tumor cells in the breast (ypT0/is) and 2) no residual invasive tumor cells in the breast and axillary lymph nodes (ypT0/is ypN0). Association between pCR and clinicopathologic characteristics and treatment were evaluated using chi-square test and multivariable logistic regression. Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank test, stratified by other prognostic factors, were conducted to compare overall survival between patients who achieved pCR and patients who did not. Overall, 4.4% of nonmetastatic patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The median age of preoperatively treated patients was 50 years. pCR rates were 18.1% (pCR ypT0/is) and 14.4% (pCR ypT0/is ypN0), respectively. pCR rate was the highest among women who had higher grade, smaller size, estrogen receptor negative, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive disease or receiving taxane-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Patients who achieved pCR had better overall survival than those who did not. In subgroup analysis, the survival advantage was only significant among women with estrogen receptor-negative tumors. Patients with poor prognostic profile are more likely to achieve pCR and particularly when receiving taxane-containing chemotherapy. pCR is a significant prognostic factor for overall survival especially in estrogen receptor-negative breast cancers.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntineoplastic AgentsBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastChemotherapy, AdjuvantDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansMalaysiaMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm GradingPrognosisSingaporeSurvival AnalysisAntineoplastic AgentsTaxoidsBreast cancerclinicopathologic predictorsneoadjuvant chemotherapypathologic complete response

Identifiers

PMID28000426
PMCPMC5269707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.