Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28000417›Full record

Trial reportPediatric blood & cancer2017

A Phase II feasibility study of oral etoposide given concurrently with radiotherapy followed by dose intensive adjuvant chemotherapy for children with newly diagnosed high-risk medulloblastoma (protocol POG 9631): A report from the Children's Oncology Group.

Adam J Esbenshade, Mehmet Kocak, Linda Hershon, Pierre Rousseau, Jean-Claude Decarie, Susan Shaw, Peter Burger, Henry S Friedman, Amar Gajjar, Albert Moghrabi

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Pediatric blood & cancer, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Old drugs still work! Oral etoposide in a relapsed medulloblastoma.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Adam J EsbenshadeMonroe Carrell Jr. Children's Hospital at Vanderbilt, Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Mehmet KocakUniversity of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee.
Linda HershonCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Pierre RousseauCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Jean-Claude DecarieCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Susan ShawState University of New York Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York.
Peter BurgerJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Henry S FriedmanDuke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Amar GajjarSt. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee.
Albert MoghrabiCentre Hospitalier de Verdun, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Funding

NCTN BIQSFP ANBL1531 (NRT)U10CA180886 · NCI · PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE · PI Douglas S. Hawkins · 2014 to 2026
$390.6M
COG FOREIGN ACCRUALU10CA098543 · NCI · NATIONAL CHILDHOOD CANCER FOUNDATION · PI ADAMSON, PETER C. · 2003 to 2013
$335.5M
COG SDMC - Statistics CoreU10CA180899 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI TODD A ALONZO · 2014 to 2026
$132.8M
Children's Oncology Group Statistics &Data Center GrantU10CA098413 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI DEVIDAS, MEENAKSHI · 2003 to 2013
$67.5M
Vanderbilt Clinical Oncology Research Career Development ProgramK12CA090625 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Debra L. Friedman, Paula Jill Hurley · 2001 to 2026
$16.9M
NCI NIH HHS K12 CA090625NCI NIH HHS U10 CA098413NCI NIH HHS U10 CA098543NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180886NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180899
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChildren with high-risk medulloblastoma historically have had a poor prognosis. The Children's Oncology Group completed a Phase II study using oral etoposide given with radiotherapy followed by intensive chemotherapy. PROCEDURE: Patients enrolled in the study had high-risk disease defined as ≥1.5 cm

resultsBetween November 1998 and October 2002, 53 patients were accrued; 15 received treatment 1 and 38 treatment 2. Forty-seven patients (89%) were eligible. Response to radiation was excellent, with 19 (40.4%) showing complete response, 24 (51.1%) partial response, and four (8.5%) no recorded response. The overall 2- and 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 76.6 ± 6% and 70.2 ± 7%, respectively. The 2- and 5-year overall survival (OS) was 80.9 ± 6% and 76.6 ± 6%, respectively. Clinical response postradiation and PFS/OS were not significantly different between the treatment groups. There was a trend toward a difference in 5-year PFS between those without and with metastatic disease (P = 0.072).

conclusionsOral etoposide was tolerable at 35 mg/m

Indexed as

Chemoradiotherapy, AdjuvantAdministration, OralAdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolDisease-Free SurvivalEtoposideFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMedulloblastomaRisk FactorsSurvival RateEtoposidehigh-risk medulloblastomairradiationoral etoposidepediatric neuro-oncology

Identifiers

PMID28000417
PMCPMC5541391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.