ArticleDrug safety - case reports2017
Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DRESS) with Teicoplanin: A Case Report.
Article in Drug safety - case reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Antibacterial antibiotic-induced drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome: a literature review.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2021Review
- Incidence of teicoplanin adverse drug reactions among patients with vancomycin-associated adverse drug reactions and its risk factors.The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2020Article
- RegiSCAR DRESS (Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms) Validation Scoring System and Japanese Consensus Group Criteria for Atypical Drug-Induced Hypersensitivity Syndrome (DiHS): A Comparative Analysis.Indian dermatology online journalArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intramuscular teicoplanin (400 mg every 12 h for three doses, then 400 mg daily, intramuscularly) was prescribed for a 37-year-old woman with presumptive diagnosis of cellulitis. On the 14th day of treatment, she developed generalized maculopapular rash, accompanied by fever, wheezing, shortening of breath, and lymphadenopathy. Lab tests revealed abnormal liver enzymes, leukocytosis, and eosinophilia. The treatment was interrupted with suspicion of drug reaction. Fever subsided after 48 h. Skin eruption and respiratory symptoms began to resolve within 2 weeks. The follow-up lab tests performed 1 month later indicated resolution of liver dysfunction. With respect to delayed onset of symptoms including fever, generalized rash, lymphadenopathy, and organ involvement, drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) was highly suspected. The causality was evaluated by conventional scoring systems. The reaction was rated as probable (score = 5) according to RegiSCAR and possible (score = 5) based on Kardaun et al.'s scoring system. However, DRESS was not confirmed by the Japanese group's criteria for diagnosis of DRESS/drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome (DIHS).
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.