Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28000029›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2017

Prothionamide susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis using the resazurin microtitre assay and the BACTECMGIT 960 system.

Y Tan, B Su, H Zheng, Y Wang, Y Pang

Abstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Non-commercial phenotypic assays for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis drug resistance: a systematic review.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Y TanDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Guangzhou Chest Hospital, Guangdong, Guangzhou, China.
B SuDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Guangzhou Chest Hospital, Guangdong, Guangzhou, China.
H ZhengNational Center for Tuberculosis Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, No. 155, Chang Bai Road, Changping District, Beijing, 102206, China.
Y WangNational Center for Tuberculosis Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, No. 155, Chang Bai Road, Changping District, Beijing, 102206, China.
Y PangNational Center for Tuberculosis Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, No. 155, Chang Bai Road, Changping District, Beijing, 102206, China. pangyu@chinatb.org.
Chinese Center For Disease Control and Prevention · CNGuangzhou Chest Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Resazurin microtitre assay (RMA) has been successfully used to detect minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of both first-line and several second-line drugs in drug susceptibility testing (DST) of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB). In this study, we firstly compared prothionamide (PTH) susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) using resazurin microtitre assay (RMA) and MGIT. Overall, the sensitivity and specificity of RMA for detecting PTH susceptibility was 96.5% [95% confidence interval (CI): 91.7-100.0] and 93.2% (95% CI: 89.6-96.8) respectively. In addition, the median time to positivity was significantly shorter for RMA than for the automated MGIT 960 (RMA, 8 days [range: 8-8 days] vs MGIT, 10.1 days, [range: 5.0-13.0]; P < 0.01). Concordance rate for MICs between RMA and MGIT for PTH-resistant group was 64.3% (95% CI: 46.5-82.0), which was significantly lower than that of PTH-susceptible group (85.9%, 95% CI: 78.8-93.0; P= 0.01). In conclusion, our data demonstrated that RMA can be used as an acceptable alternative for determination of PTH susceptibility with shorter turn-around time. When compared with MGIT 960, RMA method was prone to produce higher MICs for PTH-resistant MTB strains.

Indexed as

Antitubercular AgentsAutomation, LaboratoryIndicators and ReagentsMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMycobacterium tuberculosisOxazinesProthionamideSensitivity and SpecificityTime FactorsXanthenesAntitubercular AgentsIndicators and ReagentsOxazinesProthionamideresazurinXanthenes

Identifiers

PMID28000029
OpenAlexW2565812558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.