Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27999982›Full record

ArticleClinical & experimental metastasis2017

The prognostic effect of DDX3 upregulation in distant breast cancer metastases.

Marise R Heerma van Voss, Willemijne A M E Schrijver, Natalie D Ter Hoeve, Laurien D Hoefnagel, Quirine F Manson, Elsken van der Wall, Venu Raman, Paul J van Diest, Dutch Distant Breast Cancer Metastases Consortium

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical & experimental metastasis, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Research progress in molecular pathology markers in medulloblastoma.Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Cytoplasmic DDX3 as prognosticator in male breast cancer.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Marise R Heerma van VossDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Willemijne A M E SchrijverDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Natalie D Ter HoeveDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Laurien D HoefnagelDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Quirine F MansonDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Elsken van der WallCancer Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Venu RamanDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Paul J van DiestDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands. P.J.vanDiest@umcutrecht.nl.
Dutch Distant Breast Cancer Metastases Consortium
University Medical Center Utrecht · NLJohns Hopkins University · USJohns Hopkins Medicine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metastatic breast cancer remains one of the leading causes of death in women and identification of novel treatment targets is therefore warranted. Functional studies showed that the RNA helicase DDX3 promotes metastasis, but DDX3 expression was never studied in patient samples of metastatic cancer. In order to validate previous functional studies and to evaluate DDX3 as a potential therapeutic target, we investigated DDX3 expression in paired samples of primary and metastatic breast cancer. Samples from 79 breast cancer patients with distant metastases at various anatomical sites were immunohistochemically stained for DDX3. Both cytoplasmic and nuclear DDX3 expression were compared between primary and metastatic tumors. In addition, the correlation between DDX3 expression and overall survival was assessed. Upregulation of cytoplasmic (28%; OR 3.7; p = 0.002) was common in breast cancer metastases, especially in triple negative (TN) and high grade cases. High cytoplasmic DDX3 levels were most frequent in brain lesions (65%) and significantly correlated with high mitotic activity and triple negative subtype. In addition, worse overall survival was observed for patients with high DDX3 expression in the metastasis (HR 1.79, p = 0.039). Overall, we conclude that DDX3 expression is upregulated in distant breast cancer metastases, especially in the brain and in TN cases. In addition, high metastatic DDX3 expression correlates with worse survival, implying that DDX3 is a potential therapeutic target in metastatic breast cancer, in particular in the clinically important group of TN patients.

Indexed as

PrognosisBrain NeoplasmsDEAD-box RNA HelicasesDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansNeoplasm MetastasisTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsDDX3X protein, humanDEAD-box RNA HelicasesBrain metastasisBreast cancerDDX3DDX3XDEAD box RNA helicasesMetastasis

Identifiers

PMID27999982
PMCPMC5285427
OpenAlexW2561606796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.