ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2017
Detrusor pressures in urodynamic studies during voiding in women.
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Computational fluid dynamics of bladder voiding using 3D dynamic MRI.International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering · 2024Article
- A Discrete Mathematics Approach for Understanding Risk Factors in Overactive Bladder Treatment.Cureus · 2024Article
- Evaluation of pre-operative bladder contractility as a predictor of improved response rate to a staged trial of sacral neuromodulation in patients with detrusor underactivity.World journal of urology · 2021Article
- Detrusor underactivity in pelvic organ prolapse.International urogynecology journal · 2018Article
- Re: The article "Detrusor pressures in urodynamic studies during voiding in women".International urogynecology journal · 2018Article
- Comment on "Detrusor pressures in urodynamic studies during voiding in women".International urogynecology journal · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisTo investigate detrusor pressure during voiding in women using urodynamic studies (UDS).
methodsThe study group comprised 57 women with non-neurogenic lower urinary tract symptoms. All patients underwent UDS between January 2010 and December 2014. UDS included filling cystometry, pressure flow study (PFS), uroflowmetry for the maximum flow rate (Qmax) and mean flow rate, and postvoid residuals. Existence of voluntary detrusor contraction was defined as a continuous and smooth increase in detrusor pressure (Pdet) after the instruction to micturate in the PFS. The bladder contractility index (BCI) was calculated as Pdet at Qmax + 5 × Qmax. Statistical analyses were performed using the Mann-Whitney U test and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
resultsThe PFS showed that 23 patients had detrusor contraction (Pdet+ group) and 34 patients had no detrusor contraction (Pdet- group) during voiding. There were no significant differences in urodynamic parameters between the Pdet+ and Pdet- groups except in Pdet at Qmax and BCI. In the Pdet- group, 21 patients showed an increase in abdominal pressure during voiding (Pabd+ group), while the other 13 patients did not (Pabd- group). There were no differences in any of the urodynamic parameters between the Pabd+ and Pabd- groups.
conclusionsBased on UDS, an increase in detrusor or abdominal pressure may not be necessary in micturition in women. The present study suggests that relaxation of pelvic floor muscles including normal urethral function are important for micturition in women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.