ArticleClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2017
Acute heart failure with mid-range left ventricular ejection fraction: clinical profile, in-hospital management, and short-term outcome.
Article in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed, 71 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Role of Deep Learning-Based Echocardiography in the Diagnosis and Evaluation of the Effects of Routine Anti-Heart-Failure Western Medicines in Elderly Patients with Acute Left Heart Failure.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2021Trial
- Article
- A novel risk prediction model incorporating triglyceride-glucose-body mass index for in-hospital mortality in hypertensive patients with HFmrEF.Lipids in health and disease · 2026Article
- Guideline-directed medical strategies for the co-management of heart failure and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease.Communications medicine · 2025Review
- Timing of acute decompensated heart failure in patients with heart failure and mildly reduced ejection fraction.Heart and vessels · 2025Article
- Prognostic impact of prior LVEF in patients with heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2025Article
- Prevalence, Characteristics, and Treatment Strategy of Different Types of Heart Failure in Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024Article
- Ejection fraction at hospital admission stratifies mortality risk in HFmrEF patients aged ≥ 70 years: a retrospective analysis from a tertiary university institution.Aging clinical and experimental research · 2023Article
- Efficacy of guideline-directed medical treatment in heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction.ESC heart failure · 2023Article
- [Feasibility of Single-Breath-Hold Compressed Sensing Real-Time Cine Imaging for Assessment of Ventricular Function and Left Ventricular Strain in Cardiac Magnetic Resonance].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2022Article
- Noncardiac comorbidity clustering in heart failure: an overlooked aspect with potential therapeutic door.Heart failure reviews · 2022Review
- Association Between Physical Status and the Effects of Combination Therapy With Renin-Angiotensin System Inhibitors and β-Blockers in Patients With Acute Heart Failure.Circulation reports · 2021Article
- Treatment of Heart Failure with Mid-Range Ejection Fraction: What Is the Evidence.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
- Survival of Patients with Acute Heart Failure and Mid-range Ejection Fraction in a Developing Country - A Cohort Study in South Brazil.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2021Article
- Are HFpEF and HFmrEF So Different? The Need to Understand Distinct Phenotypes.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021Review
- Heart Failure With Mid-range Ejection Fraction: A Distinctive Subtype or a Transitional Stage?Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021Review
- Heart Failure With Midrange Ejection Fraction: Prior Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction and Prognosis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021Article
- In-hospital and long-term mortality for acute heart failure: analysis at the time of admission to the emergency department.ESC heart failure · 2020Article
- Age-dependent differences in clinical phenotype and prognosis in heart failure with mid-range ejection compared with heart failure with reduced or preserved ejection fraction.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2019Article
- CMR Tissue Characterization in Patients with HFmrEF.Journal of clinical medicine · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHeart failure with mid-range left ventricular ejection fraction (HFmrEF) is a poorly characterized population as it has been studied either in the context of HF with reduced (HFrEF) or preserved (HFpEF) left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) depending on applied LVEF cutoffs. We sought to investigate the clinical profile, in-hospital management, and short-term outcome of HFmrEF patients in comparison with those with HFrEF or HFpEF in a large acute HF cohort. METHODS AND
resultsThe Acute Heart Failure Global Registry of Standard Treatment (ALARM-HF) included 4953 patients hospitalized for HF in nine countries in Europe, Latin America, and Australia. Baseline characteristics, clinical presentation, in-hospital therapies, and short-term mortality (all-cause in-hospital or 30-day mortality, whichever first) were compared among HFrEF (LVEF <40%), HFmrEF (LVEF 40-49%), and HFpEF (LVEF ≥50%) patients. Among 3257 patients with documented LVEF, 52% had HFrEF, 25% HFmrEF, and 23% HFpEF. Patients with HFmrEF had a distinct demographic and clinical profile with many intermediate features between HFrEF and HFpEF. In addition, they had a higher prevalence of hypertension (p < 0.001), a lower prevalence of chronic renal disease (p = 0.003), more hospitalizations for acute coronary syndrome (p < 0.001), or infection (p = 0.003), and were more frequently treated with intravenous vasodilators compared to HFrEF or HFpEF. Adjusted short-term mortality in HFmrEF was lower than HFrEF [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.635 (0.419, 0.963), p = 0.033] but similar to HFpEF [HR = 1.026 (0.605, 1.741), p = 0.923].
conclusionHospitalized HFmrEF patients represent a demographically and clinically diverse group with many intermediate features compared to HFrEF and HFpEF and carry a lower risk of short-term mortality than HFrEF but a similar risk with HFpEF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.