ReviewCellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS2017
Protecting DNA from errors and damage: an overview of DNA repair mechanisms in plants compared to mammals.
Review in Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
47 citing papers in PubMed, 105 citations in OpenAlex.
- The meiotic achilles' heel: vulnerability and resilience under environmental stress.Protoplasma · 2026Review
- Nucleotide Combination Proportions Across Algae, Monocotyledons and Dicotyledons: Insights into Plant Genome Evolution.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Replication associated nuclear DNA mismatch repair across kingdoms.Biochemical Society transactions · 2026Review
- Saline-Alkaline Stress Suppresses Soybean Germination and Early Seedling Growth via Induction of DNA Damage in Roots.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Plant tolerance mechanisms to DNA-damaging UV stress.Journal of experimental botany · 2025Review
- Genomic introgression underlies environmental adaptation in three species of Chinese wingnuts,Plant diversity · 2025Article
- Article
- Review
- Metagenomic insights into the microbial communities and functional traits of hot springs in Guizhou Province, China.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Chromatin dynamics and RNA metabolism are double-edged swords for the maintenance of plant genome integrity.Nature plants · 2024Review
- Base Excision DNA Repair in Plants:International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Arabidopsis lamin-like proteins CRWN1 and CRWN2 interact with SUPPRESSOR OF NPR1-1 INDUCIBLE 1 and RAD51D to prevent DNA damage.The Plant cell · 2023Article
- Article
- Article
- Oxidative and Glycation Damage to Mitochondrial DNA and Plastid DNA during Plant Development.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- The Influence of Edaphic Factors on DNA Damage and Repair in Wild WheatInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- How Do Plants Cope with DNA Damage? A Concise Review on the DDR Pathway in Plants.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Accumulation of DNA damage alters microRNA gene transcription in Arabidopsis thaliana.BMC plant biology · 2022Article
- Review
- Current aspects of DNA damage and repair in ecotoxicology: a mini-review.Ecotoxicology (London, England) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The genome integrity of all organisms is constantly threatened by replication errors and DNA damage arising from endogenous and exogenous sources. Such base pair anomalies must be accurately repaired to prevent mutagenesis and/or lethality. Thus, it is not surprising that cells have evolved multiple and partially overlapping DNA repair pathways to correct specific types of DNA errors and lesions. Great progress in unraveling these repair mechanisms at the molecular level has been made by several talented researchers, among them Tomas Lindahl, Aziz Sancar, and Paul Modrich, all three Nobel laureates in Chemistry for 2015. Much of this knowledge comes from studies performed in bacteria, yeast, and mammals and has impacted research in plant systems. Two plant features should be mentioned. Plants differ from higher eukaryotes in that they lack a reserve germline and cannot avoid environmental stresses. Therefore, plants have evolved different strategies to sustain genome fidelity through generations and continuous exposure to genotoxic stresses. These strategies include the presence of unique or multiple paralogous genes with partially overlapping DNA repair activities. Yet, in spite (or because) of these differences, plants, especially Arabidopsis thaliana, can be used as a model organism for functional studies. Some advantages of this model system are worth mentioning: short life cycle, availability of both homozygous and heterozygous lines for many genes, plant transformation techniques, tissue culture methods and reporter systems for gene expression and function studies. Here, I provide a current understanding of DNA repair genes in plants, with a special focus on A. thaliana. It is expected that this review will be a valuable resource for future functional studies in the DNA repair field, both in plants and animals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.