ArticleDer Nervenarzt2017
[Pathomechanisms and clinical aspects of frontotemporal lobar degeneration].
Article in Der Nervenarzt, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFrontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) includes a spectrum of heterogeneous clinical and neuropathological diseases. In a strict sense this includes the behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) and primary progressive aphasia (PPA) and both variants can be associated with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (FTD-ALS). In a broader sense FTLD also includes progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) and corticobasal syndrome (CBS). In recent years the strong genetic component of FTLD has become increasingly clear.
objectiveThe association between clinical presentation, neuropathology, genetics and pathophysiological mechanisms of FTLD are presented.
resultsThe diagnostic criteria and tools for the clinical differential diagnosis of FTLD are presented. At autopsy patients show neuronal and glial inclusions of Tau, TDP-43 or FUS. While Tau pathology is often associated with extrapyramidal symptoms, patients with TDP-43 and FUS inclusions often also show signs of ALS. Pathogenic mutations directly increase the aggregation propensity of these proteins or impair protein degradation through autophagy or the proteasome. Pathogenic mutations in most FTLD genes trigger cytoplasmic missorting and aggregation of the RNA-binding protein TDP-43 and thus lead to a nuclear loss of TDP-43 function. Microgliosis and mutations in GRN and TREM2 suggest an important role of neuroinflammation in FTLD.
conclusionThere is still no causal therapy for FTLD but preclinical studies focusing on pathogenic mutations in C9orf72, GRN and Tau may lead to clinical trials soon; therefore, establishing large well characterized patient cohorts is crucial for trial readiness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.