ArticleJournal of biomedical optics2016
Fluorescence confocal endomicroscopy of the cervix: pilot study on the potential and limitations for clinical implementation.
Article in Journal of biomedical optics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy for prediction of uterine rejection in a patient submitted to live-donor uterus transplantation.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2026Article
- Rapid, high-resolution, non-destructive assessments of metabolic and morphological homogeneity uniquely identify high-grade cervical precancerous lesions.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Optical imaging for early detection of cervical cancer: state of the art and perspectives.Journal of biomedical optics · 2023Review
- Liposomes loaded with dual clinical photosensitizers for enhanced photodynamic therapy of cervical cancer.RSC advances · 2023Article
- Development of a multimodal mobile colposcope for real-time cervical cancer detection.Biomedical optics express · 2022Article
- Low-cost, chromatic confocal endomicroscope for cellular imagingBiomedical optics express · 2021Article
- Dual modal fluorescent colposcope combined with near-infrared fluorescent dye TMTP1-PEG4-ICG to detect cervical lesions.Biomedical optics express · 2020Article
- Article
- Algorithm to quantify nuclear features and confidence intervals for classification of oral neoplasia from high-resolution optical images.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2020Article
- In vivo imaging of cervical precancer using a low-cost and easy-to-use confocal microendoscope.Biomedical optics express · 2020Article
- Advances in technologies for cervical cancer detection in low-resource settings.Expert review of molecular diagnostics · 2019Review
- Optical fiber bundles: Ultra-slim light field imaging probes.Science advances · 2019Article
- Near-infrared probe-based confocal microendoscope for deep-tissue imaging.Biomedical optics express · 2018Article
- Line-scanning confocal microendoscope for nuclear morphometry imaging.Journal of biomedical optics · 2017Article
- Optical techniques for cervical neoplasia detection.Beilstein journal of nanotechnology · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Current diagnostic capabilities and limitations of fluorescence endomicroscopy in the cervix are assessed by qualitative and quantitative image analysis. Four cervical tissue types are investigated: normal columnar epithelium, normal and precancerous squamous epithelium, and stromal tissue. This study focuses on the perceived variability within and the subtle differences between the four tissue groups in the context of endomicroscopic in vivo pathology. Conclusions are drawn on the general ability to distinguish and diagnose tissue types, on the need for imaging depth control to enhance differentiation, and on the possible risks for diagnostic misinterpretations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.