Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27999855›Full record

ArticleThe journal of nutrition, health & aging2017

Building Bridges for Innovation in Ageing: Synergies between Action Groups of the EIP on AHA.

J Bousquet, M Bewick, A Cano, P Eklund, G Fico, N Goswami, N A Guldemond, D Henderson, M J Hinkema, G Liotta and 276 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of nutrition, health & aging, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Nutraceuticals: opening the debate for a regulatory framework.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2018
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

286 authors.

J BousquetProfessor Jean Bousquet, CHRU, 371 Avenue du Doyen Gaston Giraud, 34295 Montpellier Cedex 5, France, Tel +33 611 42 88 47, jean.bousquet@orange.fr.
M Bewick
A Cano
P Eklund
G Fico
N Goswami
N A Guldemond
D Henderson
M J Hinkema
G Liotta
A Mair
W Molloy
A Monaco
I Monsonis-Paya
A Nizinska
H Papadopoulos
A Pavlickova
S Pecorelli
A Prados-Torres
R E Roller-Wirnsberger
D Somekh
C Vera-Muñoz
F Visser
J Farrell
J Malva
K Andersen Ranberg
T Camuzat
A M Carriazo
G Crooks
Z Gutter
G Iaccarino
E Manuel de Keenoy
G Moda
L Rodriguez-Mañas
T Vontetsianos
C Abreu
J Alonso
C Alonso-Bouzon
J Ankri
M T Arredondo
F Avolio
A Bedbrook
A Z Białoszewski
H Blain
R Bourret
M F Cabrera-Umpierrez
A Catala
R O'Caoimh
M Cesari
N H Chavannes
J Correia-da-Sousa
T Dedeu
M Ferrando
M Ferri
W J Fokkens
F Garcia-Lizana
O Guérin
P W Hellings
T Haahtela
M Illario
M C Inzerilli
K C Lodrup Carlsen
P Kardas
T Keil
M Maggio
A Mendez-Zorrilla
E Menditto
J Mercier
J P Michel
R Murray
M Nogues
I O'Byrne-Maguire
D Pappa
A S Parent
M Pastorino
C Robalo-Cordeiro
B Samolinski
P Siciliano
A M Teixeira
S I Tsartara
A Valiulis
O Vandenplas
T Vasankari
B Vellas
M Vollenbroek-Hutten
M Wickman
A Yorgancioglu
T Zuberbier
M Barbagallo
G W Canonica
L Klimek
S Maggi
W Aberer
C Akdis
I M Adcock
I Agache
C Albera
F Alonso-Trujillo
M Angel Guarcia
I Annesi-Maesano
J Apostolo
S H Arshad
V Attalin
A Avignon
C Bachert
I Baroni
E Bel
M Benson
C Bescos
F Blasi
C Barbara
K C Bergmann
P L Bernard
S Bonini
P J Bousquet
B Branchini
C E Brightling
V Bruguière
C Bunu
A Bush
D P Caimmi
M A Calderon
G Canovas
V Cardona
K H Carlsen
A Cesario
E Chkhartishvili
R Chiron
T Chivato
K F Chung
M d'Angelantonio
G De Carlo
D Cholley
F Chorin
B Combe
B Compas
D J Costa
E Costa
O Coste
A-L Coupet
G Crepaldi
A Custovic
R Dahl
S E Dahlen
P Demoly
P Devillier
A Didier
A T Dinh-Xuan
R Djukanovic
D Dokic
G Du Toit
R Dubakiene
A Dupeyron
R Emuzyte
A Fiocchi
A Wagner
M Fletcher
J Fonseca
B Fougère
A Gamkrelidze
G Garces
J Garcia-Aymeric
B Garcia-Zapirain
B Gemicioğlu
C Gouder
B Hellquist-Dahl
I Hermosilla-Gimeno
D Héve
C Holland
M Humbert
M Hyland
S L Johnston
J Just
M Jutel
I P Kaidashev
M Khaitov
O Kalayci
A F Kalyoncu
W Keijser
H Kerstjens
J Knezović
M Kowalski
G H Koppelman
T Kotska
M Kovac
I Kull
P Kuna
V Kvedariene
V Lepore
W MacNee
M Maggio
A Magnan
I Majer
P Manning
M Marcucci
T Marti
M Masoli
E Melen
N Miculinic
F Mihaltan
B Milenkovic
J Millot-Keurinck
H Mlinarić
I Momas
S Montefort
M Morais-Almeida
T Moreno-Casbas
R Mösges
J Mullol
R Nadif
M Nalin
E Navarro-Pardo
K Nekam
G Ninot
D Paccard
S Pais
E Palummeri
P Panzner
N K Papadopoulos
C Papanikolaou
G Passalacqua
E Pastor
M Perrot
D Plavec
T A Popov
D S Postma
D Price
N Raffort
J C Reuzeau
J M Robine
F Rodenas
F Robusto
N Roche
A Romano
V Romano
J Rosado-Pinto
F Roubille
F Ruiz
D Ryan
T Salcedo
P Schmid-Grendelmeier
H Schulz
H J Schunemann
E Serrano
A Sheikh
M Shields
N Siafakas
N Scichilone
P Siciliano
I Skrindo
H A Smit
S Sourdet
E Sousa-Costa
O Spranger
T Sooronbaev
V Sruk
P J Sterk
A Todo-Bom
J Touchon
D Tramontano
M Triggiani
S I Tsartara
A L Valero
E Valovirta
E van Ganse
M van Hage
M van den Berge
O Vandenplas
M T Ventura
I Vergara
G Vezzani
D Vidal
G Viegi
M Wagemann
B Whalley
M Wickman
N Wilson
P K Yiallouros
M Žagar
A Zaidi
M Zidarn
E J Hoogerwerf
J Usero
R Zuffada
A Senn
B de Oliveira-Alves

Funding

Medical Research Council G1000758Medical Research Council G1001367
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Strategic Implementation Plan of the European Innovation Partnership on Active and Healthy Ageing (EIP on AHA) proposed six Action Groups. After almost three years of activity, many achievements have been obtained through commitments or collaborative work of the Action Groups. However, they have often worked in silos and, consequently, synergies between Action Groups have been proposed to strengthen the triple win of the EIP on AHA. The paper presents the methodology and current status of the Task Force on EIP on AHA synergies. Synergies are in line with the Action Groups' new Renovated Action Plan (2016-2018) to ensure that their future objectives are coherent and fully connected. The outcomes and impact of synergies are using the Monitoring and Assessment Framework for the EIP on AHA (MAFEIP). Eight proposals for synergies have been approved by the Task Force: Five cross-cutting synergies which can be used for all current and future synergies as they consider overarching domains (appropriate polypharmacy, citizen empowerment, teaching and coaching on AHA, deployment of synergies to EU regions, Responsible Research and Innovation), and three cross-cutting synergies focussing on current Action Group activities (falls, frailty, integrated care and chronic respiratory diseases).

Indexed as

AgingHealth BehaviorWhite PeopleAccidental FallsAgedAged, 80 and overChronic DiseaseCooperative BehaviorEuropeFrail ElderlyHumansMultiple Chronic ConditionsOrganizational InnovationPolypharmacySurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID27999855
PMCPMC12879209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.