Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27999849›Full record

ArticleThe journal of nutrition, health & aging2017

Dietary Supplement Use in Older People Attending Memory Clinics in Australia.

A J Cross, J George, M C Woodward, D Ames, H Brodaty, R A Elliott

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of nutrition, health & aging, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Dietary supplement use by older adults with chronic venous leg ulcers: A retrospective, descriptive study.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

A J CrossRohan A Elliott. Pharmacy Department, Austin Health, PO Box 5555, Heidelberg, VIC, 3084, Australia. Phone: +61 3 9496 2334. Fax: +61 3 9496 5900, Email: rohan.elliott@austin.org.au.
J George
M C Woodward
D Ames
H Brodaty
R A Elliott

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDietary supplement use is common in older adults. There has been limited research in people attending memory clinics.

objectivesTo explore the use of dietary supplements in older people attending Australian memory clinics.

designCross-sectional analysis of baseline data from the Prospective Research In MEmory clinics (PRIME) study.

participantsCommunity-dwelling older people who attended nine memory clinics and had a diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia. MEASUREMENTS: Dietary supplement was defined as a product that contains one or more: vitamin, mineral, herb or other botanical, amino acid or other dietary substance. Non-prescribed supplement was defined as a supplement that is not usually prescribed by a medical practitioner. Polypharmacy was defined as use of five or more medications.

results964 patients, mean age 77.6 years, were included. Dietary supplements were used by 550 (57.1%) patients; 353 (36.6%) used two or more. Non-prescribed supplements were used by 364 (36.8%) patients. Supplement use was associated with older age (OR: 1.12, 95% CI: 1.03-1.21), lower education level (OR: 1.53, 95% CI: 1.01-2.32) and a diagnosis of MCI rather than dementia (OR: 1.52, 95% CI: 1.05-2.21). Potential drug-supplement interactions were identified in 107 (11.1%) patients. Supplement users had increased prevalence of polypharmacy compared to non-users (80.5% vs. 48.1%, p<0.001).

conclusionsDietary supplements, including non-prescribed supplements, were commonly used by people attending memory clinics. Supplement use increased the prevalence of polypharmacy and resulted in potential supplement-drug interactions. Further research is required to assess the clinical outcomes of supplement use.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsAgedAustraliaCognition DisordersCross-Sectional StudiesDementiaHumansLogistic ModelsMemoryMultivariate AnalysisPolypharmacyTrace ElementsVitaminsTrace ElementsVitamins

Identifiers

PMID27999849
PMCPMC12879198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.