Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27999709›Full record

ArticleSurgical neurology international2016

[Microsurgical approach to the ambient cistern].

Pablo Ajler, Michael Cruz Bravo, Lucas Garategui, Ezequiel Goldschmidt, Gustavo Isolan, Álvaro Campero

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical neurology international, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Pablo AjlerServicio de Neurocirugía, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Instituto Universitario del Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Michael Cruz BravoServicio de Neurocirugía, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Instituto Universitario del Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Lucas GarateguiServicio de Neurocirugía, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Instituto Universitario del Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Ezequiel GoldschmidtServicio de Neurocirugía, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Instituto Universitario del Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Gustavo IsolanCentro Avançado de Neurologia e Neurocirurgia (CEANNE), Graduate Course in surgery, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brasil.
Álvaro CamperoServicio de Neurocirugía, Hospital Padilla, Tucumán, Argentina.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo describe a step-by-step approach to the ambient cistern by the suboccipital retrosigmoid supracerebellar infratentorial (RSI) approach. DESCRIPTION: The RSI approach is performed in the same manner as the suboccipital retrosigmoid approach, usually used to access the pathology of the cerebellopontine angle, with the following modifications: (1) we always use the semi-sitting position, (2) the craniotomy-craniectomy must expose the transverse sinus and extend 5 cm medially to the inion, (3) when performing the dural opening it is necessary to mobilize the dura with the transverse sinus upwards, (4) under magnification with surgical microscope the cerebellomedullary cistern should be opened in order to drain cerebrospinal fluid for relaxing the cerebellum, and (5) arachnoidal adherences and bridging veins must be coagulated and cut if necessary. These maneuvers create a wide corridor to the ambient cistern.

conclusionThis approach allows a safe access to the ambient cistern, especially to the infratentorial portion.

Identifiers

PMID27999709
PMCPMC5154204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.