ReviewJournal of animal science and biotechnology2016
Antimicrobial usage and resistance in beef production.
Review in Journal of animal science and biotechnology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 93 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
93 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Establishment of disk diffusion national epidemiological cut-off values for Pasteurella multocida and Mannheimia haemolytica isolated from bovine respiratory diseases and characteristics of antibiograms in Japan.The Journal of veterinary medical science · 2026Article
- Genomic analyses of antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli from extensive beef cattle and sheep farms identifies inter-species and farm-farm sharing as clonal dissemination pathways.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2026Article
- Insights from adaptive immune regulation for disease resistance breeding in livestock and poultry.Science China. Life sciences · 2026Review
- Strategies for Reducing Antimicrobial Use in Cattle Through Gut Microbiome Modulation: A Systematic Review of Alternatives to Antibiotics.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Review
- Exploring clonality ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Clostridioides difficile as a Zoonotic and Foodborne Pathogen: Reviewing the Global Evidence and South African Data.MicrobiologyOpen · 2026Review
- Hastening meat production: a review of growth promoters for traditional and cultured meat production.Journal of animal science and technology · 2026Review
- Systematic mapping of threats to U.S. beef production.Translational animal science · 2026Review
- Frequency of Antimicrobial-Resistant FecalMicroorganisms · 2025Article
- Soil management strategies drive divergent impacts on pathogens and environmental resistomes.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Respiratory Bacteria and Antimicrobial Resistance Genes Detected by Long-Read Metagenomic Sequencing Following Feedlot Arrival, Subsequent Treatment Risk and Phenotypic Resistance in Feedlot Calves.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The Potential for Sample Testing at the Pen Level to Inform Prudent Antimicrobial Selection for Bovine Respiratory Disease Treatment: Investigations Using a Feedlot Simulation Tool.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Bacterial Antimicrobial Resistance in Meat Products-Current Concepts.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Genomic Characterization ofMicroorganisms · 2025Article
- Beef Cattle Farmers' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Toward On-Farm Biosecurity, Antimicrobial Use, and Antimicrobial Resistance in Illinois, United States of America.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Assessment of Microbiological Contamination and Prevalence of Pathogenic Strains in Cattle Carcasses from Romanian Slaughterhouses.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Antibiotic-ResistantFood science of animal resources · 2025Review
- Green propolis extract derived from Mimosa tenuiflora as an additive in the diet of sheep.Tropical animal health and production · 2025Article
- The prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of respiratory pathogens isolated from feedlot cattle in Canada.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
33 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antimicrobials are critical to contemporary high-intensity beef production. Many different antimicrobials are approved for beef cattle, and are used judiciously for animal welfare, and controversially, to promote growth and feed efficiency. Antimicrobial administration provides a powerful selective pressure that acts on the microbial community, selecting for resistance gene determinants and antimicrobial-resistant bacteria resident in the bovine flora. The bovine microbiota includes many harmless bacteria, but also opportunistic pathogens that may acquire and propagate resistance genes within the microbial community via horizontal gene transfer. Antimicrobial-resistant bovine pathogens can also complicate the prevention and treatment of infectious diseases in beef feedlots, threatening the efficiency of the beef production system. Likewise, the transmission of antimicrobial resistance genes to bovine-associated human pathogens is a potential public health concern. This review outlines current antimicrobial use practices pertaining to beef production, and explores the frequency of antimicrobial resistance in major bovine pathogens. The effect of antimicrobials on the composition of the bovine microbiota is examined, as are the effects on the beef production resistome. Antimicrobial resistance is further explored within the context of the wider beef production continuum, with emphasis on antimicrobial resistance genes in the food chain, and risk to the human population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.